In a way, because of certain philosophical concepts

buddhism is to brahminism like protestantism is to catholicism

But they can also be understood from Hermetic and Greek works

I can't exactly agree

Protestantism was involution from Catholicism

It represented involution towards what's the most base and primitive in Christianty

Whereas Buddhism focused on what is the most ascetic, that is, which belongs to domain of personal undertaking, rather than domain of culture

having a lot of experience with buddhism I think the same really

buddhism is brahminism for retards

that's why guatama lost his varna and became a sudra

Not really

we R all ekwul 😃

Buddhism, once properly understood, and is very close to Greek philosophy and especially Hermeticism

Buddhism does not propagate equality

The opposite, it holds contempt for the fool, the base, the primiive, that which refuses to take action

the only buddhists I like are the shaolin

everyone else are total faggots

Buddism is by definition fool-proof since it gives the lay man almost no platform

in fact brahmin shaolin is my ideal society

That's why all those liberals whi chant about Buddha's "peacefulness" are given absolutely no platform, since by Buddhist doctrine itself, they are par exellence fools

Buddhism cannot enable no retard, unlike some other doctrines

take a retard, give him a bath, he is now one of us

while brahminism says to bathe daily minimum

Exactly, no unfit person will ever receive training in Buddhist ascesis, and isn't capable to understand it

Which is why doctrine, even though openly presented, is completely incomprehensible to average man

The same is with Brahmanic doctrine too

Whose concepts, which are borrowed by Buddhism, Shaktism etc.

Are completely incomprehensible in their secret, obscured meaning, to an average man

why not go to the source directly

brahminism openly says "aryan only" in the early texts

it's simply the point of historical perspective

In Buddhas time already, he accepted that Brahmanism has morphed into vanity

I mean most buddhism really is not so bad

I support it over most other religions

And so he looked to develop doctrine which will allow person opportunity ro realize himself without being misled by priestly decay

Above all, Buddha didn't advocate abandonment of Brahmanic faith or rituals

that sounds identical to martin luther

Martin Luther's philosophy was democratic

Buddha's was elitist

I agree really with constatation that Buddhism can be best understood as the so called "dry path"

The most contemplative and ascetic form of spiritual self-realization