POOR PEOPLE MAKE LITTLE

then what is the point of capitalism

THEY CAN BE USED TO MAKE MONEY

BUT BY THEMSELVES, MAKE LITTLE

CAPITALISM = MARKET ECONOMY VS. COMMAND ECONOMY

ALLOW THE BEST TO RISE

okay

THEN ALLOCATE THAT TO ARISTOCRATS

FOR EXAMPLE

GIVE GOOGLE TO THE DUKE OF EDINBOROUGH

let people have a mostly free market, take away a lot of their money and redistribute it based on genes

BETTER THAN LETTING IT STRUGGLE ON ITS OWN

THAT IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BALANCE CAPITALISM WITH ARISTOCRACY, CASTE AND CULTURE

ALSO

NO CONSUMERISM

LET HIGHER CASTES CHOOSE WHAT SUCCEEDS

MUCH OF THE PROBLEM WITH "CAPITALISM" NOW IS THAT DALITS ARE CHOOSING SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTS

so command economy

TWITTER AT $8BN

NO, THE OPPOSITE

SEE WHAT SUCCEEDS, THEN ALLOCATE

INSTEAD OF COMMANDING WHAT "SHOULD" SUCCEED

SOCIALISM SUCKS

IT HAS RUINED EUROPE

or rather, businesses compete and nazi kommandants decide who the winner is

and shut down their competitors

ARISTOCRATS ARE BETTER

THEY CAN GRANT I.P. RIGHTS

THIS MEANS

THAT WEALTH REMAINS IN CONTROL OF THOSE WHO USE IT WELL

INSTEAD OF IDIOTS WHO GOT LUCKY

you need to write this in an article

SEE: GOOGLE, AMAZON, APPLE

I SEE THAT YOU ARE CORRECT

take this log and use it to rewrite a better version of your last article

because this is a lot better than saying "capitalism R gud"

this is actually convincing me

and providing a vision of how it could look

IT IS ON THE LIST

AS OF NOW

IN GENERAL