Message from @OJneg

Discord ID: 303293594431651840


2017-04-16 21:10:52 UTC  

2. be made to dissapear

2017-04-16 21:10:57 UTC  

3. be made into a soap

2017-04-16 21:11:23 UTC  

or north korean method be tied to a rocket and fired into orbit

2017-04-16 21:30:39 UTC  

I did not see Berkeley.

2017-04-16 21:30:53 UTC  

Soap is the environmentalist method, is it not?

2017-04-16 21:51:42 UTC  

@OJneg Stalinism was also a national socialism

2017-04-16 21:51:51 UTC  

so-called Socialism in One Country

2017-04-16 22:07:24 UTC  

SODOMY IN ONE COUNTRY

2017-04-16 22:16:36 UTC  

@fallot sure Stalinism could be said to be nationalistic in nature

2017-04-16 22:16:55 UTC  

but we shoudl be able to agree that the Leninist/originalist was globalist in nature

2017-04-16 22:17:13 UTC  

i.e. aimed to spark a worldwide workers revolution

2017-04-16 22:17:32 UTC  

and ultimately move us to some utopian anarcho communist state

2017-04-16 22:18:48 UTC  

I guess my point was, socialism was never just about economics

2017-04-16 22:19:33 UTC  

capitalism, libertarianism, socialism (as economics) all strikes me as stupid

2017-04-16 22:19:39 UTC  

pragmatism is the only economic system

2017-04-16 22:20:05 UTC  

when you need competition, you need competition

2017-04-16 22:20:09 UTC  

when things upscale to ridiculous extents

2017-04-16 22:20:12 UTC  

you control

2017-04-16 22:20:22 UTC  

there should be some priors to these economic systems

2017-04-16 22:20:26 UTC  

some things people value above them

2017-04-16 22:20:27 UTC  

so yeah, you're basically a mixed-economy guy

2017-04-16 22:20:30 UTC  

so that these systems can lead to them

2017-04-16 22:20:36 UTC  

sort of

2017-04-16 22:20:43 UTC  

a whatever works guy

2017-04-16 22:21:12 UTC  

I'm biased towards downscaling, which is kind of libertarian or communal

2017-04-16 22:21:40 UTC  

makes sense, I'm a whatever works guy as well and I will ultiamtely be bound by any empircal evidence that shows by bias toward free market-ism to work less well

2017-04-16 22:22:06 UTC  

the issue with the free market is stuff like you see now

2017-04-16 22:22:12 UTC  

Amazon, Facebook etc.

2017-04-16 22:22:16 UTC  

it's what most libertarians concede on issues of national defense, for example. Or else they must concede lest falling into the black hole that is anarcho-capitalism 😄

2017-04-16 22:22:17 UTC  

rootless elites with massive influence

2017-04-16 22:22:39 UTC  

it makes sense to me to break these down a bit, or to curtail them so they serve the common good

2017-04-16 22:23:11 UTC  

I'm open to any good arguments for breaking up legitimate monopolies of course, as that is not somethign any free-marketer would want

2017-04-16 22:23:29 UTC  

it's not just about monopoly, but about degree of influence on society

2017-04-16 22:23:54 UTC  

monopoly or no monopoly, a private enterprise of this scale will result in a concentration of actual power in a small number of entities

2017-04-16 22:24:16 UTC  

unless we start committing to say

2017-04-16 22:24:21 UTC  

burning them at the stake if they are out of line

2017-04-16 22:24:30 UTC  

actually it's still conflict

2017-04-16 22:24:41 UTC  

the MPC guy is pretty good on this

2017-04-16 22:25:30 UTC  

though I don't accept his attribution of some issues with modern society to scale alone

2017-04-16 22:25:58 UTC  

I think we're into a bit nebulous terrritory when we talking about influence on society and how that could (or should) be controlled. My biggest issue is that any power you grant the state can ultimately used against you once you are infiltrated and subverted by ideologues (particularly ones from the left)