Communism is responsible for killing at least 100 million in the 20th century, even if you dump the war deaths entirely on Hitler's shoulders he doesn't come close

AGREED

NOT TO MENTION THAT COMMUNIST DESTROYS SOCIETIES

AND RUINS THEIR PEOPLE

A STUPOR THAT TAKES A LONG TIME TO EMERGE FROM

But of course once it fails it was only ever state capitalism let's try it again!

PEOPLE ARE DRAWN TO IT

LIKE MOTHS TO THE LIGHT

IT ENDS SOCIAL STATUS COMPETITION, THEY THINK

HAHA

FOOLS

HITLER

ANY time a group becomes immune to criticism it abuses its power

WITH ONE EXCEPTION

BUT GENERALLY, YES

Exception being?

ARISTOCRATS

THEY AVOIDED ALL OF THIS HORROR

NO BROTHER WARS UNDER THE KINGS

AT LEAST, NO HIGHLY DESTRUCTIVE ONES

LIKE WWI AND WWII

I don't follow... the rentiers of the 18th century are one of the prime reasons for the French revolution

SOME OF IT CAN BE BLAMED ON MODERN WARFARE

THAT ONLY MAKES SENSE

You would rather return to feudalism or something similar?

IF YOU ASSUME THE SERFS WERE NOT SCREWING UP

YES

http://www.amerika.org/politics/restorationists/

PEOPLE WORKED FEWER HOURS UNDER THE KINGS

HAD A SENSE OF PURPOSE

NO ENVIRONMENTAL HOLOCAUST

AS CAN HAPPEN EVEN WITH PRIMITIVE PEOPLE

SUCH AS THE LOSS OF MOST LARGE NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-xhPPJHl7s

They also had zero autonomy, no opportunities for self-determination, their communities were rooted in extreme privation, and they were frequently slaughtered due to the machinations of their miserable overlords

I don't see how that system is better than, say, the original constitutional republic of the U.S.

Taylor Swift is the fashyist Aryan goddess

THE SERFS TEND TO BE THEIR OWN WORST ENEMY

LIMITING THEIR OPTIONS RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOMES

FURTHER, SOCIETY IS ABLE TO LIVE THAT WAY

THE ORIGINAL US REPUBLIC HAS TURNED INTO BARACK OBAMASTAN