Message from @fallot

Discord ID: 319290397601955841


2017-05-31 01:42:37 UTC  

just definition wise judging is a tendency towards desiring closure in cognitive terms

2017-05-31 01:42:40 UTC  

no problem fallot

2017-05-31 01:42:41 UTC  

decisions, perceptions

2017-05-31 01:42:49 UTC  

my goal is to be a judge

2017-05-31 01:42:52 UTC  

whereas perceiving is being happy with just lettin it all flow man

2017-05-31 01:43:00 UTC  

My goal is to be a welder

2017-05-31 01:43:04 UTC  

INTJ have as their auxiliary function extraverted thinking

2017-05-31 01:43:06 UTC  

And get a boat

2017-05-31 01:43:16 UTC  

which is probably the strongest "judging" function in terms of perception

2017-05-31 01:43:17 UTC  

But im stuck in sales for a bit

2017-05-31 01:43:19 UTC  

I hate letting it all flow

2017-05-31 01:43:23 UTC  

the most "this, not that"

2017-05-31 01:43:59 UTC  

Fallot, what's the perfect personality type for a Jim Jones character?

2017-05-31 01:44:07 UTC  

unless the flow is part of the plan. There can be pre-schedule flow periods

2017-05-31 01:44:42 UTC  

a what?

2017-05-31 01:44:55 UTC  

Jim Jones has a cult that drank coolaid and like 300 people died

2017-05-31 01:45:04 UTC  

yeah but character?

2017-05-31 01:45:14 UTC  

like a charismatic lcult guy

2017-05-31 01:45:14 UTC  

cult leader?

2017-05-31 01:45:17 UTC  

a couple

2017-05-31 01:46:02 UTC  

ENTJ I guess

2017-05-31 01:46:12 UTC  

maybe ENFJ or INFJ

2017-05-31 01:47:48 UTC  

how does the jungian personality type stuff square with the big 5 traits

2017-05-31 01:48:07 UTC  

it has some correspondence

2017-05-31 01:48:12 UTC  

but big 5 is pretty worthless

2017-05-31 01:48:16 UTC  

its worth is entirely material

2017-05-31 01:48:19 UTC  

in its reproducibility

2017-05-31 01:48:30 UTC  

it doesn't tell you anything beyond the sum of its parts

2017-05-31 01:48:39 UTC  

some people have tried a synthesis or creating a new system

2017-05-31 01:48:46 UTC  

because MBTI retests so badly

2017-05-31 01:48:54 UTC  

but that doesn't mean MBTI is wrong, it means that testing is shit

2017-05-31 01:48:57 UTC  

which it just is

2017-05-31 01:49:30 UTC  

while some percentages here or there doesnt affect the broad big 5 picture

2017-05-31 01:49:33 UTC  

it can alter your type

2017-05-31 01:49:33 UTC  

so where is something like "neuroticism" in MBTI? Would it just be a different sphere?

2017-05-31 01:49:52 UTC  

neuroticism would be explained as a number of different traits producing a similar looking result

2017-05-31 01:50:09 UTC  

this is based on a theory of cognitive functions, MBTI

2017-05-31 01:50:34 UTC  

there is a correlation between NTs and neuroticism I believe

2017-05-31 01:50:55 UTC  

but there's not a universally accepted conversion formula where someone highly neurotic is predictably this combo or that combo in MBTI terms?

2017-05-31 01:51:02 UTC  

no

2017-05-31 01:51:20 UTC  

one bunch of people tried a synthesis of neuroticism