Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 337172213117485067
I see.
It's still socialism, still behaves like socialism with a command economy and reappropriation of existing wealth to the politiques but just wants to build a utopia for one people
Okay, I never argued in favor of it - but I will admit, I like Rockwell and that's it.
I more like Prussian Absolutism.
Especially during Frederick the Ist's reign.
Mostly because he built up the military and began to make Prussia and efficient system.
That's mostly why I joined was for the monarchism and because I figured I'd talk to some Nat Socs, since this was posted on Nat Soc forum.
"we" don't consider jack shit
we here means me and this other guy
by that bar we praise allah and revere muhammad
we consider that sufficient grounds to nuke exilarch
it doesn't matter what you think
exilarch needed to go to bed
@Apollo'sJest hmm?
What's your arguments for monarchism?
the "less worst" polity, because dalits don't even lead
<:source:286646690726019072>
Monarchy is just formalized natural human governance
Take some wild humans
You will get kings
Its a natural growth from tribe
when countries were not slave of economy
only the lone man can practice discretion
you cannot get it out of a committee
no matter how noble or well meaning
only the king can embody the law and yet make exceptions
he is the law with personality
only a person can temper justice with mercy, or vice versa
morning bastards
Edgy bert
I'm hungover after all of the POCs
hello, i should introduce myself maybe
I asked Prussian though...
Also: your arguments are weaksauce af, go to like monarchism 101 or something lel
I would say something mean if it weren't for your obvious disability
Oh feel free, I'm a tough little retard
No witty comeback?