Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 337276936684306432
time will tell if it has any legs
but in terms of what people understand simply
the president runs things
he embodies the nation
it has an intuitive appeal
To be honest I wouldn't give it more than a few decades... I mean the US has changed systems in its past already....
do you have an objection to monarchy
besides what I've been saying etc.
just in general
Most people would call me a monarchist actually lol. Technically I'm a republican but I don't blame em for calling me a monarchist... I do want a hereditary head of state/executive, just not a monarch.
one big issue with republics or any kind of committe rule is bureaucreatization
and promotion of mediocrity
That is a much less retarded argument^^
I'm not a monarchist either, I have your position
exactly
I'm not too fussed about hereditary
There's also biological incvestment of the "monarch" in the well being of the state
yeah that's another big argument
and thus more responsibility
noblesse oblige
and if noblesse does not oblige, the perspective of your kid getting his head chopped off does
Modern political responsibility is a joke
I don't think just kings are a good idea
on top must be a divine law of some sort
then king
Well then you're a normie
Normies want a restoration of the monarchy lol?
normies are great
you should aspire to be a normie
If you don't want kings and micromanagial dictator you're normie
no dictator or king can micromanage
micromanagement is a feature of bureacracy
1) What are you smoking @Sinian
2) One does not decide weather he is or isn't a normie tbh
"micromanagement is a feature of bureacracy"
Tell taht to Friedrich the Great or Louis XIV
they establlished bureaucracies
Weather
s'a bit more complicated than that, but I was mostly meming there
1) Take a B52
2) Bomber Oil plants
3) Bomber industries like Coca Cola
4) Bomber Africa
5) Eject
6) Be happy and smoke a Cohiba
why bomb africa
would be more productive to bomb san francisco or something