the big draw for me for kings etc. is what I mentioned initially about personality

you can have that aspect with like a presidential system

like in the US

a fine system

time will tell if it has any legs

but in terms of what people understand simply

the president runs things

he embodies the nation

it has an intuitive appeal

To be honest I wouldn't give it more than a few decades... I mean the US has changed systems in its past already....

do you have an objection to monarchy

besides what I've been saying etc.

just in general

Most people would call me a monarchist actually lol. Technically I'm a republican but I don't blame em for calling me a monarchist... I do want a hereditary head of state/executive, just not a monarch.

one big issue with republics or any kind of committe rule is bureaucreatization

and promotion of mediocrity

That is a much less retarded argument^^

I'm not a monarchist either, I have your position

exactly

I'm not too fussed about hereditary

There's also biological incvestment of the "monarch" in the well being of the state

yeah that's another big argument

and thus more responsibility

noblesse oblige

people tend to fill in to their environments

and if noblesse does not oblige, the perspective of your kid getting his head chopped off does

Modern political responsibility is a joke

I don't think just kings are a good idea

on top must be a divine law of some sort

then king

Well then you're a normie

Normies want a restoration of the monarchy lol?

normies are great

you should aspire to be a normie

If you don't want kings and micromanagial dictator you're normie

no dictator or king can micromanage

micromanagement is a feature of bureacracy

1) What are you smoking @Sinian
2) One does not decide weather he is or isn't a normie tbh

"micromanagement is a feature of bureacracy"
Tell taht to Friedrich the Great or Louis XIV

they establlished bureaucracies

Weather