fucke him

lubos is why i like mathematicians over physicists

feynman sucks too

einstein is also very overrated

poincare and hilbert got there first

Lubos is a good guy, I read his blog

von neumann was smarter than bohr and schrodinger

https://pastebin.com/raw/ig70ZdwW

check that out

its an excerpt from a short book

urs schreiber is like lubos motl if lubos motl was actually good at math

by Bruce Charlton

but there are different areas of math

this is complicated

there are two vague pillars of modern math

analysis which is calculus

and algebra which is symbolic and conceputal

physicists are the former, logicians, computer scientists, topologists, are moreso the latter

lol why did you post raw

thats impossible to read

i switched to nonraw

I like it raw

https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/j2aA0d4R/nietzschepsych.pdf

this is my response

mind you i only read like half

depression again

endogenous to me means subconscious/unconscious

the HIGHER MIND in vedanta

its more like channelling or mediumship than cogitation

surrealist even

raw is usually fine but the lines dont break

http://geniusfamine.blogspot.co.uk/

book in question

im going to have to get back to you on this

too depressed

do try to read that pdf i linked though at least a little

i would also say deleuze, who i mention in my blog, called in individuation and rhizome

he was influenced by jung

is reading my blog impossible for you or what lol

its sort of a summary of my psychological theories

are you familiar with apollonian versus dionysian?