@spaceplacenta devolved told me you're spaceplacenta

im reading critique of pure reason again

i also started a blog

neutrosophist.wordpress.com

lol

>outer space

newton was a unitarian christian

fedoras have no sense of intellectual history

big bang theory was also first formulated by a catholic priest, lemaitre

true

yeah its omnidirectional right

Lol I know seductive jewess

A Jewish kid showed me

He's white passing though, dutch

American but dutch heritage I mean

but im not banned from here?

thats weird

i just want to study mathematics and metaphysics

ok

i think i showed himmy blog

ok so

logic question

what would the alt-alt-right be

alt-left? just normal nonalt right? nonapplicable?

do you guys study race science?

i dont know much statistics or biology

but im curious

ive researched facial analysis before

linear algebra

eigenfaces

Want to read this, easy book, but my depression prevents me

what MBTI are you and Nester

just primary, idc about secondaries

also have you read any freud or jung

or which psychologists do you read

i know you mentioned Haidt already, when we first chatted on irc

im sort of interested in George Lakoff

what fiction do you read then

oh youre pakistani, right

do you read urdu poetry lol

iqbal

ah

naqshabandi's borrowed from kundalini yoga huh

but they said its sorta satanic

yes, Lacan who i read, calls it the mirror stage

false self is more of a vedanta and r.d.laing concept

lacan is more buddhist, he says there is no true self

Sunyata/emptiness/Void

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryam_Mirzakhani#Death_and_legacy

damn

iranians are really good at STEM

nah she already got the fields medal

the nobel for math

fuzzy logic was an iranian as well

lol have you seen MDE LA Street Fashion

melody ihsani

there is also an iranian in williamsburg street fashion

soho rejanijad or something i couldnt make it out

i mean she already proved a lot of theorems

so its not like she didnt have accomplishments already

ok

elaborate

give me some examples of true versus false genii

grothendieck is my guru, and brouwer

im schizoaffective lolo

grothendieck had delusions

yeah, stem autism

machine learning, programmers

whats ALS?

oh hawking

no he hasnt had any breakthroughs since the 70s black hole stuff

edward witten is the new einstein/hawking supposedly

but i prefer mathematicians to physicists

so im betting on urs schreiber

my internet friend matt has met urs in real life

mochizuki yep

mochizuki's work is based on grothendieck man

thats why grothendieck is my hero

no, i havent kept up with math news

math moves really slow man

lubos is false dude

fucke him

lubos is why i like mathematicians over physicists

feynman sucks too

einstein is also very overrated

poincare and hilbert got there first

von neumann was smarter than bohr and schrodinger

urs schreiber is like lubos motl if lubos motl was actually good at math

but there are different areas of math

this is complicated

there are two vague pillars of modern math

analysis which is calculus

and algebra which is symbolic and conceputal

physicists are the former, logicians, computer scientists, topologists, are moreso the latter

lol why did you post raw

thats impossible to read

i switched to nonraw

https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/j2aA0d4R/nietzschepsych.pdf

this is my response