Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 347469405703241728
I still think some of the pseudoscience claims are predicated on a belief that MBTI is supposed to be predictive
most critics aren't pushing refined methodology criticisms
its too much effort to tease apart the whole mess underlying such statements with every interaction
between the INTs
on the P side you get "can I confirm it"
but on the J side the concerns are more
"is it true" and "is it useful"
truth-o-meter comes built in
well I agree it's better to look at the whole thing as magic, especially in the hermetic sense
of that word
yeah, that's how I mean it
sorcery
alchemy
yeah
Breeding the Spawn is their creative peak.
I remember you linked m e some months ago but I can't remember their names
I agree it is their creative peak
it has some advantages, overall I remain displeased with testing
some types type themselves easily
some types (not MBTI) may not have sufficient insight, personal honesty, or take the test seriously enough
Ok
Effigy is probably still the better album
you're not very ambiguous Spinal
unless you found the designation to be jarring
You mean my results?
I've found that one's results with the MBTI change with age.
That's interesting, and seems reasonable
yes, your results
your results can change with age due to personal growth
your type doesn't change
if your type changes
MBTI is worthless
Hmmm. Aren't results and type tied together?
there's a lot of room to mistype
I think best results for reproducibility
are like 0.7
in that case yes, best as far as I am concerned