Message from @fallot

Discord ID: 347475286100541450


2017-08-16 20:20:23 UTC  

again, you missed the point

2017-08-16 20:20:28 UTC  

I started out saying, I can offer you nothing

2017-08-16 20:20:40 UTC  

then you said "falsification is valid", of course its valid

2017-08-16 20:20:45 UTC  

@charles watson "Are they just inevitble development of lower class right wing aingst?"

2017-08-16 20:20:45 UTC  

who is questioning its validity?

2017-08-16 20:20:50 UTC  

Interesting question.

2017-08-16 20:20:52 UTC  

all I said is it has value

2017-08-16 20:20:59 UTC  

MBTI that is

2017-08-16 20:21:13 UTC  

but its subjective, so you wont be able to see for yourself until you get into it a bit

2017-08-16 20:21:21 UTC  

what's counter-signaling? am I doing that?

2017-08-16 20:21:22 UTC  

I can't "show you" anything beyond that

2017-08-16 20:21:25 UTC  

You said: "you are not coming at this the right way."

2017-08-16 20:21:30 UTC  

I'm just wondering how to answer MBTI questions accurately

2017-08-16 20:21:40 UTC  

I assume that "this" is an attempt to find out more about the subject

2017-08-16 20:21:47 UTC  

as your starting point is "this isn't valid"

2017-08-16 20:21:54 UTC  

and mine is "I can't make you think any different from that"

2017-08-16 20:21:57 UTC  

@charles watson It seems that WN1.0 appeals to those who missed out on it the first time around. It may also appeal because it's simple. Simple messages for simple people.

2017-08-16 20:22:08 UTC  

say I have taken the test, investigated the type description and found the information to be inaccurate. What then?

2017-08-16 20:22:25 UTC  

then I imagine you will confirm your opinions

2017-08-16 20:22:40 UTC  

but insights I have gained through MBTI remain

2017-08-16 20:22:43 UTC  

so I will retain mine

2017-08-16 20:22:50 UTC  

its impossible to "disprove" MBTI to me

2017-08-16 20:22:53 UTC  

it can only be refined

2017-08-16 20:23:08 UTC  

a natural democratic result. You give the proles power in society, there understanding of a greater order is there, but limited

2017-08-16 20:23:35 UTC  

on the other hand

2017-08-16 20:23:40 UTC  

maybe you will find the information

2017-08-16 20:23:43 UTC  

not to be "accurate"

2017-08-16 20:23:45 UTC  

Democracy is death.

2017-08-16 20:23:48 UTC  

but to be insightful, valuable

2017-08-16 20:23:55 UTC  

(also accurate)

2017-08-16 20:24:10 UTC  

It would appear that if both of our findings can be correct then that poses as issue for MBTI

2017-08-16 20:24:36 UTC  

yeah, sure

2017-08-16 20:25:08 UTC  

while you could be a number of types, INTPs are those with this level of skepticism

2017-08-16 20:25:09 UTC  

a problem that assumes consistency is a pre-requisite for validity

2017-08-16 20:25:11 UTC  

generally

2017-08-16 20:25:27 UTC  

I think its pretty much a given you are an INTx

2017-08-16 20:25:45 UTC  

INTJ's = MasterRace

2017-08-16 20:26:15 UTC  

is the truth not true if it isn't confirmable?

2017-08-16 20:26:30 UTC  

bring a wide enough net to an area in which fish are known to congregate and I am sure you will catch something

2017-08-16 20:26:42 UTC  

but why throw stones from outside

2017-08-16 20:26:46 UTC  

when you could see for yourself