but I also can't just piece context free facts together to come to a pretty unsupported conclusion about the mental state of a man I don't know especially in this political environment

sure

but lets say you grant the conclusion

what then?

I guess you already answered it

as for the facts and their conclusion, this requires a feel for it I suppose, a general familiarity

I guess it depends on what you think can be done about it

dont cheer him, remove him from any position of responsibility

and watch him a bit

have a high threshold of suspicion

for shenanigans

in anything fishy that comes up with regards to him

right but you can't give that serious credence because he has committed the sin of believing illegal immigration to be a problem in AZ

so any signal is lost in leftist noise

I hate it when people like him

occupy such niches

these people specifically seek out such issues

Any good metal distro/label from your country?

you can see a very very mild form of this even in @Deleted User 57835c2c

Black metal mostly

yeah but don't just fit facts to your assumed conclusion

e.g. both alt right and antifa would be great places

for sociopaths to prosper

plenty of non sociopaths in AZ aren't happy about the border issur

have to separate the man from the issue

to support him simply because he seems to support 1 issue you do seems craven and without principle

or because he embodies a certain mentality

that seems approrpriate to deal with an issue/critics

Al Sharpton is also a sociopath, and assuming Arpaio is as well

I'm not convinced of the arpaio sociopath thing

both have more in common than you do with Arpaio

How much do you even know about the guy besides that JNS post

dont need to know anything else

Al-right can be considered like the Nationalist side on the Spanish Civil war

the case is already made

nothing can mitigate it

well, a miracle

a union of all anti-communists people, and im sure that antifa are like republicans they will end up killing each other

Because justnotsaid said it

no, because his narrative leaves no room for a different conclusion

assuming the facts are as stated