someone less fundamentally rooted and connected to the society around themselves

someone more open to experience

being more likely to support such a radical change in living arrangements

whereas the people whose instincts benefit from this are likely to think you're crazy etc.

I am pretty open I would say

and I would agree, not in temperament or in historical practice a local-ist

probably radically, compared to the average person

yes, radically

but having traveled very extensively, I have grown to hate it

"which way I fly am hell- myself am hell"

said Milton's Lucifer

nice

https://www.stellarmaze.com/intj-the-visitor/

https://scontent.fsnc1-3.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/21077583_1731334217160242_1279864214315832676_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=21d0fc3d510e962f7cb1e97d35dcf32e&oe=5A5F4CA0

maybe a bit overdone

but you may find some resonance

who are those dudes

i think its a face swap

objectivism lol

my opinion of Ayn has shifted again in the last couple years

now I think most of her critics are just emotionally reactive

It's David duke

her fundamental philosophy seems evil

and on the verge of luciferian

elements of it are worth respect I guess

she occupies the same place in my heart as hitler

however, I have no great familiarity with Ayn Rand

My respect for her philosophy hasn't grown

she turned into a horrific jewess though

just my contempt for her critics I guess

Tolkien wasn't intj?

no

maybe? I don't know

Charlton is probably

INTJs and INFJs have an important symbiotic relationship

each provides the other fuel

and Charlton seems like an INTJ

I have read more Ayn Rand than average

I think she's smart. She's not a great prose fiction writer, but she's got a good enough stack of talents to be read

her philosophy is pretty evil I think

but the criticism of fools always makes me want to defend positions I don't even agree with lol