Message from @J ·
Discord ID: 352206926320500748
the observer is an irreducible part of phenomena
do you object to this statement?
im having a hard time thinking about that statement really
not quite sure what you mean
in the double slit experiment, measurement i.e. observation
alters the result
yes it does i agree
not simply as a result of some perturbation caused by measurement as a process
but the actual act of "observing" whatever it is
that's my understanding yes, because it alters the system
to your first statement
that cannot be it, per wheeler's delayed choice experiment
fuck it's been a while, let me check
I'm not a physics anything, so I may use jury-rigged explanations
but I'll try to find people who have discussed it
okay, I'll probably have to look up shit on the fly because for some reason I didn't do any of this in detail in the first year I've just done, quantum mechanics is next month
from wikipedia, per Wheeler
"The thing that causes people to argue about when and how the photon learns that the experimental apparatus is in a certain configuration and then changes from wave to particle to fit the demands of the experiment's configuration is the assumption that a photon had some physical form before the astronomers observed it. Either it was a wave or a particle; either it went both ways around the galaxy or only one way. Actually, quantum phenomena are neither waves nor particles but are intrinsically undefined until the moment they are measured."
*intrinsically undefined until the moment they are measured*
not physically perturbed by the action of measuring
one possible implication of this is that the perception determines the reality
I don't know shit about this yet but assuming that's true whats the conclusion
this is as far as I go too, its just food for thought
to put a chink in the armour of a certain assumed view of consciousness
which when you think about it, seems a bit strange
because it in a sense makes consciousness invalid
so how did it come to occur in the first place?
what happened that this became essentially the dogma of the modern world?
is this the way people before us, the vast majority of humanity, thought as well?
or did they have a different fundamental view of reality and their own selves?
I feel like there's an issue with coming to that as an implication but I'm gonna need to think about it a lot more
Umm, Fallot, this is all well and good but have you even read Dan Dennett
lol, that guy
another acceleration idea: create a "leftist" campaign telling Southerners that their ancestors were traitors to the crown/america, and thus, they are less American and need to give up their backward ways and apologize for something or another. make it an apology request that's hilariously ignorant of history
post the meme in moonbat leftist groups and have them spread it
to accelerate southern nationalism
issue: leftists don't seem to care much about being traitors
or patriotism
the left can't meme, so we can meme for them