Message from @Sen
Discord ID: 358001735442235402
I thought we knew that
In Swedish school, I was indoctrinated to believe that the Swedish word for justice, "rättvisa", means "equal share for every one"
But of course, what it really means, is that which is morally right or otherwise honourable
Which may or may not mean, an equal share for every one
Speaking of fair and its meaning
typical swedish behavior
this was a pretty interesting read for me, some of you might like it
excuse the chan format, but the subject matter is neat
I wouldn't mind actual refutations
afaik they conquered because of the ridiculously weak power structures that existed in post roman north africa, middle east and anatolia as well as the shithole that was india at the time, with a reasonably solid militaristic ideology
they conquered because allah willed it
yeah no shit
that's not his main point
nor anyone's
islam is a barbaric shit ideology incompatible with reason
*proceeds to stop typing*
it's fact
yeah ok great argument
Why are you trying to convince a Mohammedan that islam is undesirable?
That is just silly
Would you try to convince a Mongolian raider under Genghis Khan that his ways are undesirable?
fallot - Yesterday at 11:31 PM
why does it need explanation that islam is compatible with reason
there have been people who are muslims
and capable of reason
Individual adherents prove nothing, because they may or may not be true followers. Plenty of muslims are fine with gays, apostasy, freedom of expression, etc. But they are false
The only thing that matters is the doctrine itself
that makes no sense
That's not obvious to us. I can name less than five Mohammedans, except for Mohammed himself
he's arguing that a true follower of Islam rejects reason
Wahabi, Ali, the shia guy
by nature of the doctrine
the sunni guy
The guy who said that math is the devil
A bunch of Mohammed's wives, actually, but they don't count
A medieval man
Algebra is an Arabic word
I can assume the inventor was a Mohammedan
It's not an argument, it's an assertion

