yes

and women, pushed to pursue masculine virtues, failing to compete, also fail to develop feminine virtues and a natural sphere of feminine influence, then look with envy on men outcompeting women at the game of being men

all while retaining feminine instinct

there have been a few scientific studies in the past pointing out how the more equal the two sexes are in terms of social capital the more obvious it is what really separates them

They are pushed to pursue some virtues, like engineering

feminists have looked at india sayign women work in mines therefore its fair and equal

Other masculine virtues, on the other hand, are disowned entirely

>engineering
>virtuous

they forget how fucking poo rthose coutnries are tho

spotted the enginigger

In my experience, the push has been something like "achieve in the same way men achieve - go to work, make partner, feel independent from family, strive to make your mark"

imo if someone excels at the subjectt then its fine

if theyre shit they need to stop

Who's doing the pushing though

@TendieLord shareholders

^

money is big motivator

human capital is valuable. women work really hard. something like an associate law job, a woman can defintely excel at because it's basically just dotting is and crossing ts

doubled labor pool pushes wages down, increases competition

Yeah "excelling" in the sciences is basically getting answers right on tests and putting unreasonable amounts of effort into writing lab reports

Women don't really excel at it, they're just on par

You yourself said that the job can not be excelled at

They excel at being conscientious and working hard at menial tasks

there are outliers who excel

Everyone is the same in that job

yeah @UOC

@Hagel women don't make partner

the outliers are who im referring to

Most of the students at the top of my high school class were girls

women just stay associates and the partners profit from their grunt-work

These conversations tend to be muddy and imprecise. Are we discussing "worth" or "ability"?

In my argument, I am arguing that women have the ability to excel at certain areas of law which do not require a blistering IQ or forceful personality or strategic thinking. They make good associates because they will do reliably simple and repetitive tasks forever without asking for a raise. That is a feminine value subverted by capitalists

and leftist ideologues

more and more tasks are becoming simplified and formulaic, it seems to me

at least in the sciences

Overspecialization is the trend

women have an IQ gain on men in the 14-17 yo range

by like 5 points

they develop faster

and school is a very rudimentary, safe environment

the skills do not transfer over to the real world thats why we see a disparity