Message from @TendieLord
Discord ID: 369944154819657739
It is a natural consequence for men to look down on women, when they are raised with modern expectations of women
Women become seen as merely inferior men, once the lie of equality is seen past
Part of it is that the sexes are equalized in every minor difference
So the only remaining differences are the extreme disparities, which are magnified
Put boys and girls together in the same engineering classes, and the differences in their thinking become immediately obvious
A man will pursue his natural masculine virtues, be told that women are the same, and see that women keep failing at those virtues, and then look down on the women
yes
yes
and women, pushed to pursue masculine virtues, failing to compete, also fail to develop feminine virtues and a natural sphere of feminine influence, then look with envy on men outcompeting women at the game of being men
all while retaining feminine instinct
there have been a few scientific studies in the past pointing out how the more equal the two sexes are in terms of social capital the more obvious it is what really separates them
They are pushed to pursue some virtues, like engineering
feminists have looked at india sayign women work in mines therefore its fair and equal
Other masculine virtues, on the other hand, are disowned entirely
>engineering
>virtuous
they forget how fucking poo rthose coutnries are tho
spotted the enginigger
In my experience, the push has been something like "achieve in the same way men achieve - go to work, make partner, feel independent from family, strive to make your mark"
imo if someone excels at the subjectt then its fine
if theyre shit they need to stop
@TendieLord shareholders
^
money is big motivator
human capital is valuable. women work really hard. something like an associate law job, a woman can defintely excel at because it's basically just dotting is and crossing ts
doubled labor pool pushes wages down, increases competition
Yeah "excelling" in the sciences is basically getting answers right on tests and putting unreasonable amounts of effort into writing lab reports
Women don't really excel at it, they're just on par
You yourself said that the job can not be excelled at
They excel at being conscientious and working hard at menial tasks
there are outliers who excel
Everyone is the same in that job
yeah @UOC
the outliers are who im referring to
Most of the students at the top of my high school class were girls
women just stay associates and the partners profit from their grunt-work
These conversations tend to be muddy and imprecise. Are we discussing "worth" or "ability"?
In my argument, I am arguing that women have the ability to excel at certain areas of law which do not require a blistering IQ or forceful personality or strategic thinking. They make good associates because they will do reliably simple and repetitive tasks forever without asking for a raise. That is a feminine value subverted by capitalists
and leftist ideologues
more and more tasks are becoming simplified and formulaic, it seems to me