Is it okay that I'm way left and I'm here

Am I going to get banned

no

but you will be sodomized

Thanks papa

I'm biracial so it's kinda hard for me to oppose multiculturalism just saying

we have a nice location set up for you in north africa

or maybe florida

YOU CANNOT BE AGAINST WHO YOU ARE. THIS IS WHY WHITE PEOPLE WANT TO BE WITH THEIR OWN, JUST AS OTHER RACES SEEK TO BE WITH THEIR OWN. IT MUST BE INCREDIBLY CONFLICTING TO BE SO DIVIDED IN YOUR ALLEGIANCE.

I mean I'm not remotely anti-white, I just feel like it's pointless to separate stuff

Just like you said how nobody wants to go against themselves, I don't want to be killed or displaced in the name of white nationalism

So naturally I'll oppose it

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IS WRONG WITH DIVERSITY AND WHY THE LEFT LOVES IT: PEOPLE WHO NO LONGER HAVE A GENETIC/RACIAL/ETHNIC/NATIONAL IDENTITY HAVE AN ALLEGIANCE TO NOTHING BUT THEMSELVES. THIS KIND OF RADICAL INDIVIDUALISM NATURALLY LEADS TO COMMUNISM.

TRIBES ARE ALLEGIANT TO TRIBES. DESTROY THE TRIBE, CONTROL THE PEOPLE.

@faux leather what two species are you

I mean cross-species aren't fertile so sort of weak argument

but black/white

I see

actually the word "species" derives from I believe latin "specere," related to the words "spectacle" and "spectre" and such, it literally means "visibly distinct variety"

biological species autism is really quite fuzzy, only lay people really think there is a hard and fast definition

But scientifically that's not the definition used

that depends which scientists you ask

Latin roots normally aren't exactly as the words are used normally in science

yeah people just kinda make up their own definitions, but if you stick with science long enough you see that those definitions are rather faddish and come and go every few years

after a few cycles of seeing them make up new words to describe old phenomena, you honestly stop giving a shit and just use your own words or directly describe the phenomenon without lingo

Fair enough I guess

this decade science has decided that the cutoff is ability to breed, but even that is bullshit

polar bears and grizzly bears can breed together, yet they are considered species

all of darwin's finches could breed together and be fertile

But I mean you all can see why people that aren't white would oppose America becoming a white ethnostate, right?

so even the scientists don't seem to hold to their own autistic definition

of course, it's natural for a parasite to snarl and bite when being extracted from its host

I did the math once, if you take all the foreign aid and welfare spending of the USA and divide it equally among only white people in america, each of us would get an extra $30,000 USD per year. We wouldn't even have to do anything or change anything, just cut out the parasites and enjoy our own earnings

@faux leather JUST BECAUSE YOUR PEOPLE HAVE BEEN HERE A LONG TIME DOESN'T MEAN THAT THIS IS THEIR COUNTRY.

It's nobody's country lol

people don't own people

no, it's our country only

or culture

THAT'S A LIE, @faux leather .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

"The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. "

America was explicitly supposed to be aryan only from the beginning