Honestly, I think my ancestors were thralls

I look at my family and am embarassed

THE NORM IS NO STANDARD BY WHICH YOU SHOULD JUDGE YOURSELF

My dad had potential though, but needed guidance

what percentile would you place yourself in, hagel?

WHEN MEASURING MYSELF AGAINST MY OWN STANDARDS, I FALL WAY WAY WAY SHORT

AS IT SHOULD BE

Spade, for IQ, I'm only a bit above average

couldn't join mensa

For athleticism and skill, I am considerably above average, though

Oh,

125 AND ABOVE IS BETTER THAN 90% OF THE POPULATION AT THIS POINT.

there's a thing called N-Back which I excel at

if there was a mensa for that, I might be able to join

Basically, you see squares light up on a grid, and you hear letters be spoken

then if the same letter or the same grid is activated, a certain amount of turns later, you have to react to that

continiously

depends on which population you're talking about

global iq is lowering at an increasing rate

People used to be smarter in the past

that's true

Not only due to race mixing, but general dysgenics

global IQ is 86

is it actually

I SPEAK OF THE WHITE FOLK, WHOSE AVERAGE IQ HAS BEEN DWINDLING THIS PAST CENTURY

fucking christ

I think that the degradation of genes can explain the fall of many empires

I know what I am, I have found my place in the order

The order doesn't exist

Whether this or that individual should be bred, should have a few children only, or have no children at all is not an interesting philosophical question, as it is a mere particularity. If he is above average, he should breed more than average, and that depends on the circumstances

An average person from the past would be above average today, and today it would be good to breed him

STUDY: Humans love dogs more than other people...

That sounds plausible

who wouldn't

other than islams

Human cultures today don't have any coherence, there is no shared purpose or value

Dogs, on the other hand, become part of the pack

they hunt together with the human, etc

consider your biases may condition you to draw correllations as causation

my biggest problem with this discusion is that there is no separation between correlation and causation in anyone's assertions

What are some examples of when people may have confused the two, from today?