why do we keep on using shit sources to back up our claims

I do not care about source quality

I care about spamming anything that backs up my claims regardless of truth

oh ok

libshits have been doing it for decades, seemed like a good enough plan

>for decades

source pls

if you count catholics, for millennia

I do not do the "lol source???" game

you have the internet, look shit up

or make one of these spergs do it

ok but the thing is it's not going to come up with anything useful when i search "liberals spamming bad sources"

I have other stuff to do besides parse internet sources, I deal exclusively in executive summaries

which side are you on again? is your handle ironic?

it's ironic yes

then fucking lurk /pol/ or do some digging

pol is trash

i think he was trying to do a funni discord brigade or something and it didnt work

how so

what do you mean by discord brigade

again, all of their sources are trash and they marinate in unsubstantiated claims and ridiculous assumptions/generalizations

what do you mean what do i mean

i mean i dont know how you're using the word brigade in this context

or why

sorry i dont keep track of all of the cool internet language these days

o-ok

ye whats the right word, raid or something

I'm not trying to raid this server

raids are a waste of time

i dunno, i figured those images you posted were supposed to make someone angry here

they weren't

good, because they didnt

sources are overrated

source-centric thinking is reddit thinking

hm

good thinking starts with observation, then is reasoned upon

Do you not have an ideology at all then?

and never at any point trusts others to do the thinking for you

If you'll just accept anything that affirms your assumptions

not much of one, but everything I believe in is because of my observation and reasoning, not others' sources

and what did you do to acquire said observations?