In Medieval times, Jews usually were not allowed to live in a house that was built with any non-flammable materials; so frequent was their culling

I'm not trying to impress anyone. But I did make it clear that I am addressing ideas, and calling them accurate or not. I react to your lack of tact, too, mainly. So, restart?

Nah

@Josh sauce on flammable shtetl?

@Josh yes, I know the history, it supersedes NS. But NS abstracted is not about killing Jews.

@Exilarch I'll look for it, I can't remember where I read it

@Pelagius I never said kill them

If you can convince them to all go to Israel or something, and never have any contact with white people again, then I don't really care that they exist

What really gets me is that Jews have an Ethnostate, but they say we're racist for wanting the same thing

@Josh. For sure. They're a traditionally and self-admittedly hypocritical and dishonest culture-folk.

It's one of the things I liked about ACTUALLY READING from the Talmud, not just looking up quotes on the internet. They spill the beans A LOT in there.

@Josh " @Pelagius I never said kill them"
And I did not say don't... :-)
I only state what in my view is accurate or not about NS.

@Exilarch " Why do you assume these two do not understand already"
Well, they keep stating things in direct contradiction to what I think is accurate. I do not assume, I observe.

THE PROBLEM WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM

IS THAT IT FAILED

True

HITLER LAUNCHED A WAR TO FINISH WHAT WW1 HAD STARTED

AND THEN LOST AGAIN

THE STAGGERING INSANITY OF IT MAKES ME ITCH ALL OVER

"LET'S COMPOUND THE TRAGEDY!"

Except, Hitler did not launch the war, how many times must this be stated.

HE HAD SOME GREAT IDEAS, CARRIED FORTH FROM SCHOPENHAUER AND THE THULE GESSELSCHAFT

TRUE, HE DID NOT

BUT

And as more and more facts come out, this can be more and more openly stated.

IT WAS MADE INEVITABLE

AND THEN HE FOUGHT AN OFFENSIVE WAR

INSTEAD OF A DEFENSIVE ONE

I think this is the point: THE PROBLEM WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM IS THAT IT FAILED

I am going to have to add natsoc to the list

Natsoc was only part of the piece

@diversity_is_racism Stolfi argues that Hitler's error was not fighting an offensive war to the end, but essentially half-assing it by going fast offensive first and then repeatedly refraining.

It wasn't a complete ideology

Stolfi the MILITARY STRATEGIST WHO TAUGHT FOR YEARS AT WEST POINT.

@diversity_is_racism , Stolfi also argues that the only upper hand the Germans had was their lightning offensive war, that it was completely untenable for them to fight defensively, i.e. lack of adequate resources in the long term.

@diversity_is_racism , furthermore, PETER DRUCKER was of the opinion that WW2 was won by the incredible management of virtually unending resources poured into the Allied banks.

@Pelagius NO DOUBT REFRAINING WAS AN ERROR! LOL

ALSO MICROMANAGING

AGREED WITH @Aryan Republic -- IT WAS NOT COMPLETE

OLD RIGHT SAYS: NEED ARISTOCRATS