Message from @Josh
Discord ID: 405169517388365825
the logic that when atoms become attached to each other, they become different things
and that sort of reaction happening in a really intense environment could yield some really diverse things
i.e. the big bang
So how did these atoms exist?
i don't know
So you have faith?
no
You believe in things you don't know though
oh sure, but i'm not saying everything is known and science is the reason
Then how is it logical much less proven?
Something thst is not known cannot be proven
mhmm
i never said i know where the universe came from
But that is a part of rejecting religion
If you accept monkeyman theory then surely you have some idea of what made the world if not God
i dont reject religion
i just don't believe the bible was the beginning of man
What is that if not a rejection of religion?
Assuming you mean "bibles", not just the christian bible
this is of course a very bible-absolutistic pov
any really
So they are all wrong? But science is correct?
a great deal of religious people don't necessarily take the bible to be a literal account of events
Those are called heretics
lol yes
If majority rule does not apply here, why does it apply to barney theory?
"Well I fondly remember the land before time from my childhood"
that wasn't the basis of my argument
No
It was not
I'm just asking
i didn't mean it as any evidence. i just wanted to open you up to the idea that some people interpret the bible metaphorically
so they might get benefits in that way
That's heresy
and they might call you an extremist
What benefits will they get by lying to themselves that the book is true and not true at the same time?
as much benefit as you would anything else
"Only the nice parts were real"
You cannot grow as a person if you reject "unhappy bad bads"
sometimes the lessons aren't so nice