Message from @Horns
Discord ID: 430138085779701772
Beholding the presence of God in the mind.
AND YOU ARE HERE TO HOLD MY PENIS AND SHOW ME THE RIGHT WAY?
FANTASTIC
I WILL DELEGATE MY STAFF TO TAKE NOTES
Unlike your collection of servile INTJ cohosts, I've actually read these authors.
The discussion group Everitt Foster held on evola reached no deeper than the hypocrisy of modernity and equality.
Which everyone who would attend would already know anyway.
Even in regards to the more pragmatic sides of Evola, I've never seen anyone discuss his "apoliticism" in relation to the errors the alt-right made regarding Trump.
Nor his explicit repudiation of mass-movements as a foundational method.
They just meme RIDE THAT TIGER BRO
Nor have I ever seen anyone mention that he thought Hitler was "possessed by demons".
In that sloganeering bit you just did, Evola himself would fall under what you label "THERE ARE THOSE WHO WANT TO RIDE DOWN THE COLLAPSE"
Even staying at the pragmatic level, he also explicitly repudiated enclavism and biological reductionism.
You have a problem when you list people like Evola and Nietzsche as high influences and do the opposite of what they said.
Without confronting it.
He also believed individuality was grounded in a hierarchy which began with the universal and proceeded to the specific.
The divine (God) --> Imperial Churchwarriors ---> Local State ---> Tribe ---> Human
From high to low
It is the Divine that is the Real.
A human becomes an Individual to the extent that he is able to foreground himself in the Divine Real and act from it on the material plane.
Which is why his work moved toward Perennialism and Guenon.
Explicitly rejecting empiricism in favor of "intellectual intuition", which in Guenon's form is close to meaning "revelation".
Via serious, grounded belief in a Traditional Religion.
And conveyed via initiated circles, as the official religions decay.
From the Evolan point of view, the alt right is Titanic chair re-arranging.
And Nietzche would just think it's what he wrote about Forster.
So that seems to me a problem.
I'll probably get some all-caps slogan and banned.
Used to it by now.
Ride that tiger.
Bro.
"The State is under the masculine aegis, while “society” and, by extension, the people, or demos, are under the feminine aegis. Once again, this is a primordial truth. The maternal domination, from which the political-virile principle subtracts itself, was also understood as the domination of Mother Earth and the Mothers of life and fertility, under whose power and tutelage existence was believed to unfold in its physical, biological, and collective-material aspects. The common mythological background is that of the duality of the luminous and heavenly deities, who are the gods of the political and heroic world on the one hand, and of the feminine and maternal deities of naturalistic existence, who were loved by the plebeian strata of society on the other hand. Thus, even in the ancient Roman world, the idea of State and of imperium (i.e., of the sacred authority) was strictly connected to the symbolic cult of the virile deities of heaven, of light and of the super-world in opposition to the dark region of the Mothers and the chthonic deities. "
It shouldn't be necessary to point out this is opposed to libertarianism, anarchism, and muh local government.
Nor does it support the alt-right method of idealizing a category of the foundational Material.
Alt-right is a form of Mother cult.
in his diction
"The previously mentioned gap between the political idea of State and the physical idea of “society” is found again in the opposition that exists between State and nation. The notions of nation, fatherland, and people, despite their romantic and idealistic halo, essentially belong to the naturalistic and biological plane and not the political one; they lead back to the “maternal” and physical dimension of a given collectivity. Wherever these concepts were emphasized and bestowed with the dignity of a primary element, this has always happened in a revolutionary or even polemical function toward the concept of the State and the pure principle of sovereignty. With the passage from the expression “by grace of God” (as approximate and stereotypical as it was, it still designated the true right “from above”) to that of “by will of the nation,” what really occurs is the above-mentioned inversion, which is not a shift just from an institutional structure to another, but also from one world to another world, separated by an unbridgeable hiatus. "
HERE IS YOUR LOGICAL FALLACY:
1. ASSUME EVOLA IS THE ONLY SOURCE
2. INTERPRET NARROWLY