Message from @Max Payne
Discord ID: 371116160256704514
We know his
lmao wait for him to finsih
all two of them
they are focused more on discrediting his position then on systematically analyzing his argument. it wouldnt surprise me if half of these kids wrote down some edgy atheists arguments from a website and keep spouting marxist modernist perspectives
Darth is arguing from a circular position though, but it is one of faith, ultimately.
That's not a post-modernist position, that's just a fact
but his argument stated that athiests hold circular arguments as well
If one cannot argue in the affirmative, they have faith that their position is infalible.
based on laws as authority
I don't think Darth has argued that way
If you believe God is supreme and His law is the bedrock for the universe, awseome.
i do NOT believe in god
we formed from evolutions
evolution*
in atheism you have to hold something as a supreme law or authority otherwise the world wouldnt exist
modern science i mean
im gonna blow my brains out
oh my god
Me too
CaN SoMeOnE MoDeRaTe ThE FrEaKiN ROOM
Whitney
😄
WhITneY
guys darth is saying something that is against my feels plz ban him
lololol
Postmodernism=Become absolute retard
Boy that Italian family sure is quiet
post modernism is not everything is subjective
idiot
pretty much is
uh
no its not
post modernism is the abandonment of the human experience up to this point.
While encompassing a broad range of ideas, postmodernism is typically defined by an attitude of skepticism, irony or rejection toward grand narratives, ideologies and various tenets of universalism, including objective notions of reason, human nature, social progress, moral universalism, absolute truth, and objective reality.[4] Instead, it asserts to varying degrees that claims to knowledge and truth are products of social, historical or political discourses or interpretations, and are therefore contextual or socially constructed. Accordingly, postmodern thought is broadly characterized by tendencies to epistemological and moral relativism, pluralism, irreverence and self-referentiality
dawkins offered solid foundations for his arguments not founded in moral relativism
it was mostly whitey who sounds like that
dawkins argues from the position of faith, though.
which i do not fault him for
necessarily.