@red THEN U BELIEVE IN SOMETHING WITHOUT PROOF

SO UR OWN CLAIM

IS WITHOUT PROOF

OR U JUST LIVE ON A CHEESE CAKE

@TYLER You have to assume the uniformity of nature before you can believe in God.

the personal authoritative revelation of @Snoo and @red and @Alex the er... owl guy.

@SmugAnimeGirl NO

ur proof is cuz god said

revelation

not cuz u said so

@TYLER Please tell me how one can come to believe in God without first assuming the uniformity of nature.

but its jerking off to theory

@TYLER Please tell me how you could convince a blubbering retard with no sense of reason why God exists.

wat

u cant

@TYLER Exactly.

@TYLER You don't realize that this is just word spaghetti?

so what

god is absolute and just , i can rely on a universal eternal standard of justice

One is claiming they know. The other isn't. Yes, both of those ideas are based off reality, but that doesn't make them synonymous.

@TYLER So you're using the uniformity of nature to justify God, putting you on the same level as the rest of us.

It's illogical word spaghetti

Jesus christ

they claim they know he is not real

so you are wrong

@SmugAnimeGirl im using revelation to the principles

of uniformity

you are not going to say you have no positive statements

YOU DO

causality

even design

Nope

and if you say you dont you are a liar

i would say

so you are a liar

"I don't know" is different from "I know"

@TYLER How can one read revelation without the uniformity of nature? How can one read or understand anything without operating under the assumption of uniformity?

Sorry?

You say God does not exist

WRONGH

I say