Message from @Wheelz
Discord ID: 376438855789969418
@TYLER Yes, but the laws and principles you claim to rely on are themselves reliant on other assumptions.
lmao
Uniformity does not even have to be attributed to a deity.
That is just a human generalization.
then do you know what it can be attributed to?
It can be attributed to anything justified.
what would that be?
Hence, A huge spaghetti penis.
These people can't comprehend the difference between claiming "I know" and "I don't know". And Darth is using word spaghetti to basically just keep repeating, over and over again, "Your belief is just as ficticious. Because both are based off reality. And you can't measure anything. Because a measuring of something is based of nature. So the measure might not be 'true'"
It's absurd
legless we get it you dont understand basic concepts
its k
/ face palm
@SmugAnimeGirl like?
Sorry.
@TYLER Like the uniformity of nature, or some basic trust in your senses.
idk what you are talkingabout wheelz
sorry
i honestly dont
@SmugAnimeGirl what assumptions
Zeph was god ununiform before it created uniformity?
: )
?
cool
@TYLER An assumption that nature is uniform. The notion that if x implies y, and you have x, y follows.
Was god nonlogical before it created logic?
you won an arguement i didnt know was going on i guess
@TYLER everything hinges on this assumption
@SmugAnimeGirl theres no assumption in final authority of those principles
initial point of creation
@TYLER To even begin to comprehend the existence of a final authority, you must already be familiar with those principles.
initial conditions
Presumably god created the ability to create, but if he could already create, then he couldn't create the ability to create again... god is a contradiction and can't exist
If it is charged with creating everything
including the ability to create