The deist does not

what do u mean personal

God is somehow detectable through his actions or states to ones experience

In christian theism, this is things like revalation and Jesus coming to earth etc

But that's just a theistic constraint

what

so what

whats ur point

So its not an argument against Diesm

hes not personal, hes universal

the argument is revelation

That isn't an arguement either

other revelation doesnt explain

That just presumes his position is true,

which is to beg the question

sorryh

let me correct that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9H1pTw0p4A

the laws ,the principles are explained in revelation, if u dont beg his authority, u beg your authority

i trust the final authority of design

He is pressuming Wheelz position to be false because he assumes his own position to be true, and that is to just beg the question

against Wheelz

he has given his reasoning

i presume nothing

guess you didnt listen as usual

He hasn't given reasons

he has

What was it?

Revelation

God having authority and contact with the world

Deism does not

Right, so Wheelz denies revelation, how would Darwins argue it

Because all he can do, is assume revelation

WHICH BEGS THE QUESTION

Which is not an argument against Wheelz

Well the bible is actual acccounts of happenings in time

just like the flood was real

There's nothing incoherent off the bat about Wheelz

but you believe in Pangea or some other science lie

LMAO

so you will always be wrong