I’m telling y’all, mental health was a big campaign promise on guns

All this talk about guns, and nobody taking bets of Spanish civil war 2.0?

Catalonia will be an independent republic in a day or two

then it'll be promptly annexed by spain

incredible that there is still no confirmed motive

Could be a crazy guy

Why do you think those Cho did what he did

What is the average age of people in this thing?

12

I have an eerie feeling I'm mostly attempting discourse with children

what would be the motive of a retired millionaire who did not make it clear what his goal was @🎃Boo-ton🎃

besides mental illness

Check the pol anon

yea im not going on 4chan buddy

thicc

daily reminder to get trained in first aid.

discussion about People in the United Kingdom could face up to fifteen years in prison for repeatedly viewing "far-right propaganda" or "terrorist material" online.

civil war coming?

no need

repealing SALT deductions destroys democrats already

single most important thing trump can do

https://steemit.com/guns/@techius/b-b-but-australia-has-gun-control

thats a dumb argument

USA has gun control.

AUS is just better at it

saying that civilians are at a disadvantage to criminals with guns is stupid. you got a gun and you not a farmer or a hobby shooter. you a criminal. you a criminal. you get jailed or shot. if a law abiding citizen is hanging around criminals. thats their fault.

and if a law abiding citizen is caught in cross fire between criminals that just comes down to shit happens

what?!

*Would you rather $200 be spent on a gun, which goes to helping tax paying citizens stay employed and help American businesses, or would you prefer that guns go up to $10,000 and allowing cartels to get a new source of revenue?*

yeah then you really must have to wanna kill the shit outa someone to be spending 10k on a gun

well i mean if you hit a bird while driving we arent gunna build glass domes over roads to protect birds....shit happens

and if you still typing away at the USA has gun control thing. well if they didnt you wouldnt have to get a background check

1) having guns automatically makes one a criminal?
2) if government (or anyone rich and powerful enough) ever wanted to, they could (and are doing this if it's beneficial) frame any law-abiding citizen and he would suddenly be considired a criminal
3) when regular citizens can have guns, they can actually protect themselves;
often police can't; criminals are less likely to mess with such citizens

I would tell you to kys, but it's against the rules, so I'm not telling you to kys.
But I would very much like to!

1) Unless a farmer or a hobby (hunter or target) / olympic style shooter.

2) that lands under shit happens. govs and rich people are framing cunts all the time. its just the world we live in with rich people running the world.

3.a) I mean why bother with police.. You should just get to shoot a crim and drop em off at the morgue and say "tried to rape mah daughter"

3.b) That's just fear talking. if you cant trust your law enforcement or where you live to not be assaulted by someone then you should move somewhere safer where you dont need a gun to protect from crims.

You are an asshole, you type to slow.

(2 and further) - it means you can never be 100% sure in government or police, or anything for that matter. no matter where it is.
but you should be able to protect yourself, your home, your family at all times *on your own*
You've been typing this for quite a while as well.

True.

It's called a gate.

with a padlock

"aw but but they can climb"

yes they can, but i can also poke, poke them off my damn fence

why are you so opposed to this?