yes, and they are wrong?

Morality is not objective

For it can associate itself with anything.

but im saying

Morality is objective

why do you want it to be objective so badly

@whytho Moral Objectivism > Moral Absolutism > Moral Subjectivism

if it isnt, then morality has no meaning

@4450 I live in the root of crackers and you in the root of niggers? :D

It is purely dependent on the ideals of the populace.

if it doesnt matter in the end

people still do shitty things

my country was never a colonial empire, my people are white but we still get shit on by the EU and globalists.

that isnt what it means you retard lol

People do, whatever they fuck they want.

Atheism is ok

ok

Atheism is vacuous.

lets take a step back

@Logical-Scholar You are white, so therefore bad

Theism is ignorance.

That's your opinion

@4450 You tell me I live in the root of crackers when black slavery were barely a thing here. Jeez.

And it doesn't matter

Submit to knowledge.

why is morality objective

You know why

kayle is racist facist neo nazi

its not even that i want it to be subjective

>people still do bad things so morals are pointless

@Ylva root of crackers as in root of the food

@whytho so your argument is that it would be horrible if morality wasn't objective because there would be no meaning so therefore it is objective?

@Ylva dickhead

Because otherwise it literally means nothing?

And because morals come from god?

its that there isnt a compelling reason for it to be objective

@The23rdPower It's not what Morality is or not, but what you want your populace to be

dickhead crisphead

I already said that. @shrub

morality is objective because one person may think it is morally okay to marry children and one person may think not.

@4450 What does a food have to do with anything though?