^

i just don't

same @amygdala

I never thaught id say this @amygdala but i am actually agreeing with a trap.

I'm a little bt twitchy from coffee

I hope it doesn't make me talk fast

It's 11pm and I have a flight in 8 hours

Idc

Lol

OK moron

Your life

Tickle me

>"just a troll lol"
>keeps reacting

Jesus is this guy actually not trolling

get in vc @whytho

<:ThinkYourself:356316544734724106>

he's a brony defending flat earth

in school tbh

this can't be real

rip

@trent good choice on selecting a quality user trent!

"Explain without sources?"

W

T

F

"Ignore all science and facts that have been gathered"

@Deleted User d0e93084 🙂

who here a let hacker like me

i was being a smartass if you couldnt tell

so was i

🙂

no

No, allowing him to throw youtube and other peoples arguments at me is not a debate.

he should have his own prep, he should know his subject.

If it's backed up, it's not

no sources allowed eh?

He called me retarded multiple times, DM'd me, asked if I was seriuoos, called me retarded when I was, etc.

If sources are unconfirmed, I would agree

are you serious? are you retarded? are you seriously retarded?

what if someone states whole books as sources?
you'd have to read them all to get the point

Also, I do agree ad hominems made his argument seem weaker