over 17% reference stock clock

not factory clock

for non-reference

I got 6384 on FSE, which is pretty good for a 980

GTX 980 Engine Specs:
2048
CUDA Cores


1126
Base Clock (MHz)


1216
Boost Clock (MHz)

the card came at 1366 boost

and it ran nice and cool

1270 base

relative to stock card boost you, get just over 17% higher freq with 1425mhz

just leave it there and be done with it

and 3600 on mem

I will, just gotta figure out what voltage it's happy at

you're manually changing voltage for your GPU?

yeah, Precision XOC

If you're going over highest auto-voltage, then you are degrading the card faster, it will barely do shit, but also voids warranty

what's the max voltage increase it allows?

don't do more than like 8% more than max auto volatge

and find a stable spot there

I did like 50mV over lmao

I don't care, gonna run this baby into the ground

@Polygon what card are u tryin to oc?

trying?

I already did, and billy's just being a mom

make and model

Gigabyte GTX 980 gaming, three fan version

ive never oc'd anything under 1060

cant help

didn't need help

just wanted other's scores

when will the fucking cryptocurrency rape end?

i remember when GTX 1*** series was cheap

and RX 400/500s were like the best deals out there

It's already gotten much better, but is still cancerous

@Wayne Quantum computing is the only way "Artificial Intelligence" will ever come to fruition.

Depends on their productivity. If we can make a quantum computer that allows us to create true AI, then what's to say we can't use conventional architecture processing at an enormous scale to achieve the same goal? Of course there will need to be improvements on many things to achieve what quantum processors could, but who's to say quantum computing is required for it? We already have some intense deep learning performance between GPU's CPU's and more intelligent software. At the rate of progress we're at for that sort of thing, we may be able to create neural networks as complex as some more complex multi-cell organisms by the next decade, but that's just speculation, I can't personally back that up. Time will tell. Just remember, quantum processors can have more packed in atomic transistors with quantum properties that doesn't make them as straight forward as binary processing, but it will likely prove difficult to take advantage of those properties, so the software side of quantum computing alone could easily set us back.

@Citizen Shane

Also the precision of the current CPU manufacturing process is as fine as 10nm, and the amount of transistors in one confined area is incredible. So the benefit we'd get from quantum transistors, especially given our current progress is debatable until there is observable benefit.

hey nerds

gaming desktop or gaming laptop

why not both

poorfag