Now personally i would not advise going higher than the regulator circuit allows

I'm fully aware of that, going like 50mv over isn't even close to 8% over peak anyways

well i've had a r7 240 running at 1.4v (max the regulator will allow) for about a year now

What's the typical max voltage under load?

i think it was like .9v or 1v one of the two

lemme check the bios if i still have it

I douuuubbbt it

My GTX 760's will go up to 1200mV

Continuously as a max

Never heard of a max under like 1100mv

nevermind

ok its 1.15v max

it just usually runs around .9

Yeah, but you wanna measure max so you know your peak after the increase

That's like 21% higher then

i mean its the max the card can physically do without physically modifying it

How much benefit do you actually get out of that extra .25v though? What's the max freq for no-voltage OC versus that 1.4v?

Stable ofc

no voltage OC is +300mhz, 1.3v gets +780mhz, but i keep it at 1.4v because i want to see when itll die since its a cheap card

And you game with that +780 no issues?

the card runs at 780mhz max without overclock

yeah

though im not personally using the card anymore

And there's no freq difference between 1.3 and 1.4?

still, its in my household getting used daily (lmfao fallout 4)

correct

if there is, its too small for me to care to measure

What's the cards total frequency?

Before oc

730, 780 when it goes into the manufacturer's boost clock

oh yeah i forgot to mention 1.3v helps with memory overclocking a bit but its not by much

the card doesnt memory OC very well anyways

There's a 45% difference in frequency for that 21% increase in voltage. I mean, I won't believe that until I see it, because you get less return in a sloped path, the higher the voltage gets.

how do you want me to prove it?

if it matters to you enough, that is

Also you're like doubling the frequency, it has to perform at least 50% better

however take note

A video I guess

it overclocks high at stock voltage

What's the OC at stock voltage?

The 300