Message from @Xenoframe
Discord ID: 501996317896212490
@Ben boo boo I will get 140 instead of 150 FPS in a CPU limited game
Can literally buy TWO R7 2700Xs for the price of one i9 9900K lmao
What a meme
Or one with mobo and ram
Who the fuck uses i9 for vidya
Nobody
That’s retarded
i7 has always been used and is known to be good to use for vidya
You have much more of a performance-excellence gradiant with Intel CPUs playing vidya, from physics-intensive games to sandbox top-downs and simulators.
Ryzen can not and will not compete with Intel on games like Arma, Squad, Insurgency, anything with background physics-intensive computation and multiple instances of heavy load processing
I will admit that Ryzen has much more competitive performances in vidya with more assets applied at once, especially in DirectX12 games.
But it’s still not worth it if the 8700k beats it or ties with it anyways in the competitive spectrum and other.
Which was your point
In vidya
Not speed
Imagine saying vidya
@Xenoframe outside of 4chan
>good meme
Easier to type than having to explain video games
Point is that you know what it means
So in the end, it’s fine either way
Anyways, as you misinterpreted the point, I’m talking about performance in games rather than raw speeds
<:GWsetmyxPeepoWeird:405337568155009024> Did you miss the point too?
<:GWragTbhfam:390321741525942272>
Prices
Who the fuck looks at passmark in 2018
Its reliable nigger
Who the fuck uses Xeon/Threadripper to bring an argument to video game performance
Now look at performance/dollar Chart @Xenoframe
I'm just mentioning these benchmarks and prices because we were on the topic of benchmarks and prices
Not trying to argue anything
the pricing of the i9 9900K has no bearing on the price that I paid for my i7 8086K
they only caught on my poke
your conversation was based on your original comment ">using intel in 2018"