That was a real, identifiable turning point in American politics.

Confederation is a term that has nothing to do with slavery and if the South won I'd have no idea what the world would look like.

Man why don't we just print more money, like nigga we are in so much debt, just print trillions of dollars and balance it out

I theorize it would be better, but there's no way to ascertain that.

<:FeelsLELMan:356316501105442817>

YES GOY

Le. Most Politicians

PRINT MORE MONNIES

PRINT MORE SHEKELS

you mean OOFS

nah dog, create a new currency, peg it to the dolla, den print 21 tril and say der you go it's paid brodda

Catholics=Pagans @Chilliam Ace

Qrayon* @Chilliam Ace

also I wanted to make the point that When the country is decent, a basis ideology to people that aren't politcal/left or right is nationalism

https://books.google.ca/books?id=TilCeCKDujQC&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y&fbclid=IwAR0mxQvvRjPuFla-6Abq14wBL7f1dK4ZB_HGIaXMcEjhg1cfn1K-GLuK01w#v=onepage&q&f=false

Right wing memes are the best

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/cia/russholmes/pdf/104-10406-10110.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0DGCoSBQFJP0wrF9FxZ-lGphEpJ7Audf0HUM3MoR06yWeQ07ufZBTrQg0

@Kierketard lmao

fucking radical capitalist

sounds like GrandX

**"There can be no tolerance to democrats and communists in a libertarian social order."**

>conspiracy theorist=delusional

Hoppean Libertarianism is pretty critical of Democracy, and suggest communal covenants as a practical means of establishing communities.

ls it still capitalist?

100%

Not epic

If it's not Capitalist, it's gay.

Not really, lol

You could technically make a Communistic communal covenant.

@Kierketard try Corporatism under a fascist system

not the worst

Please don't tell me you think that capitalism and communism/socialism are the only 2 economic systems @Kierketard

I don't; I'm just giving an example. The dichotomy is the easiest to make hyperbolic examples of.

Define communes

elaborate on this further

why are there SO many counties?

**Before 1948, these covenants were legally used for segregationist purposes.[18] In the United States in the 1920s and 1930s, covenants that restricted the sale or occupation of real property on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, or social class were common in the United States, where the primary intent was to keep "white" neighbourhoods "white". Such covenants were employed by many real estate developers to "protect" entire subdivisions. The purpose of an exclusionary covenant was to prohibit a buyer of property from reselling, leasing, or transferring the property to members of a given race, ethnic origin, and/or religion as specified in the title deed. Some covenants, such as those tied to properties in Forest Hills Gardens, New York, also sought to exclude working class people; however this type of social segregation was more commonly achieved through the use of high property prices, minimum cost requirements, and application reference checks.[19]:131–7 In practice, exclusionary covenants were most typically concerned with keeping out African Americans; however, restrictions against Asian-Americans, Jews, and Catholics were not uncommon. For example, the Lake Shore Club District, in Pennsylvania, sought to exclude various minorities, including Negros, Mongolians, Hungarians, Mexicans, Greeks, and various other European ethnicities.[19] Cities known for their widespread use of racial covenants include Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit, Los Angeles, and St. Louis.[citation needed]

90% of the housing projects built in the years following World War II were racially restricted by such covenants.[20]**

Hoppe also elaborates on the "physical removal" of those who directly threaten the covenant, in action and speech.

Kentucky is based