Message from @Thule-Gesellschaft [☩]
Discord ID: 489940925259448320
You just told me before that they were all knowledgeable.
no I didn't, I said that they were divinely inspired
doesn't mean they literally knew everything
oh I thought you meant as in were they learned men
not "all knowledgeable" as in they were omniscient or something
You are being disingenious now.
And evasive when caught lying.
no that was my mistake
I did answer that way, but I don't understand the context you're asking this in
all knowledgeable as in know everything?
or learned as in educated
because no man can know everything, but yes the gurus were educated and learned men
ALL knowledgeavle means, posess ALL KNOWLEDGE possible.
Does that make sense?
Caste requirement is that you be a scholar and intellectual to even be considered to be entrusted with passing down scriptures
@Richard Rock No I never claimed they have all knowledge
what an infantile question in itself
yes I just explained the context
usually people say "omniscient" to refer to all knowing
not "all knowledgeable"
I thought you were asking if every guru which was involved in the process knowledgeable at his craft
Sir, if you are not going to be honest and stop being evasive when caught lying, and stop lying when I show that you lied in your face, this discussion is over.
are you going to talk about theology
or are you going to waste my time with your subhuman drivel
Anyways.
Are you aware of that one has to possess all knowledge to know anything? (If not given direct revelation from an all knowing source)
?
As I repeatedly said, the scriptures are divinely inspired. No contradiction here exists wherein the writers of them were fallible men and thus couldn't write truth.
And no you don't need to know everything to be able to write scripture
that is absurd
and idiotic
btw I don't want to make this a debate about quran quotes
Sir can you answer my question and stop being evasive, you are giving me a bunch of mumbo jumbo.
so if you're going to go that route might as well quit while you're at it
overarching theology and its relation to philosophy
that is what interests me
I'm not being evasive, I've already answered your question a hundred times.
Either you begin talking about theology and not semantics, or this conversation is over.