But later on got fucked @Kami

Read the doc too

@Azrael go stone your mom

<Kami

Weeaboo

so, i was watching this movie "no country for old men" last night and....I noticed that in the movie, they portray whites in the south in a very stereotypical way. almost comical. and the Cohen brothers (the directors of that movie and many others) always do that. they make fun of white people BUT they never introduce a black character that has flaws or is weak or dependant on other people etc. The cohen brothers happen to be jews. so I wonder...what does that even mean?

one possible explanation is just Political correctness going to far, to the point of idiocy. There's obviously a more sinister explanation.

One can wonder if the millenials were (zoomers are) influenced (and how much?) by the repetition of these type of popular culture products.

White man hate huh

The only hate that isn't considered as racist or sexist

If you let your child bellow the age of 16 use snapchat you’re a bad parent

At least they've finally admitted to it, Trump is pushing back against postmodernism, despite being a mere moderate.

wew m8, imagine being a leftist today with your selective outrage and blatant arrogance, comparing yourself to blacks during the civil rights movement fighting segregation and legitimate racism.

So because of one declaration by the SCOTUS in 1883, we should just open up to the demands of whatever anyone wants or says they are entitled to, no matter how ludicrous and how many other federal laws it contradicts with?
And what does that have to do with leftists today screaming about the alleged erosion of civil rights, xenophobia, allegedly unjust incarceration, and alleged racism,

The people who marched during the civil rights movement and before then actually faced legitimate racism and in some cases, violent hate crimes against them, fully endorsed by politicians and other officials.

this does not happen today. There are no police and firefighters hosing blacks with high pressure firehoses. Minority kids are not being prohibited from entering certain schools. Blacks are not being lynched. There are no crosses being burnt on lawns of black households. There is no legal segregation. The paygap between men and women does not exist any longer. And as long as you can sign your name, you can register to vote.

lnstead, they say that anyone who does not want full blown amnesty, open borders, transexuals reading books to children in classrooms, abolition of the second amendment, and the destruction of statues that have been standing for over 50 years,, you are a racist nazi upholding white supremacy.

@Fred the Fish

@Fred the Fish legal equality is already a reality

you are campaigning for equity under the guise of equality

if all you want is equality, you can shut up now. You have it, now go away

Your kind have asked for "compromise" for at least a century, and when compromises are made you just escalate your demands and ask for compromise again. You will never stop, so your positions should be completely ignored and your "compromises" reversed.

https://www.neuroquantology.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1079/852

@Fred the Fish That passage from their decision is wrong, since in many states free blacks didn't enjoy the same essential rights as white citizens. But they were right, the 14th Amendment never gives Congress the power to legislate against that.

@Mord is on fire today

also,

@agag can you post something (ever) that is NOT antagonazing some one else ?

tyvm

@John Rebuttal Ok, I agree with NormieCamo that many people today pursue equity under the guise of equality

how

when was the last time a black person was lynched

when was the last time you saw a black and white water fountain

or a whites only swimming pool

yeah losing that legislation was a bad thing for Reconstruction but it's Congress's fault for passing it under the 14th Amendment

I don’t think any of us was born before the 1950’s to see any of that but yea it was a long time

You are an actual brainlet to say any of the things that happened during and before the civil rights movement towards blacks still goes on today.

>it just looks different

Let me get this straight then

the SCOTUS doesn't exist to legislate or make the most utilitarian decisions, it exists to interpret the Constitution, and the Constitution does not give Congress the right to legislate against private discrimination under the 14th

the good news is it does give them the right to do that under the Commerce Clause

which is what they used in the 60s