Message from @NormieCamo

Discord ID: 502563898076168212


2018-10-17 05:45:21 UTC  

Rachel Auerbach’s *Oyf di Felder fun Treblinke*, the source of these claims, was published in 1947, very shortly after the war. It’s possible that the blood as a combustible material claim comes from the same story or a similar one to the one you posted earlier. It is true that women cremate more easily, or faster, than men, and that body fat was in fact used as fuel for ovens and burning pits. Tauber talks about this for incineration of bodies in ovens, saying that “During the incineration of such corpses, we used the coke only to light the fire of the furnace initially, for fatty corpses burned of their own accord thanks to the combustion of the body fat.” (https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/body-disposal/) So the rest of the claims here do make sense.

I won’t bother responding to your last meme. The people at Holocaust Controversies have already done a good job with debunking most of the retarded Holocaust memes. The only one I'll touch on is the masturbation machines one; this comes from *Stolen Soul*, which is a fraudulent book. Bernard Holstein's real name is Bernard Brougham, and he is a fraud.

2018-10-18 06:39:25 UTC  

you know

2018-10-18 06:39:31 UTC  

recently, i was wondering

2018-10-18 06:39:53 UTC  

Is it common for christians couples to have sex before marriage now?

2018-10-18 06:40:03 UTC  

we all know that it is for non christians

2018-10-18 06:40:05 UTC  

<:Thonk:362811285869559808>

2018-10-18 06:40:42 UTC  

Protestants Def yes catholic and orthodox depends on the region

2018-10-18 07:58:33 UTC  

@CaptainDynamite Orthodox Christian here- NO! I don't know if the youngins in my church do it behind closed doors but it's always said that Pre-marital sex is a sin as sex is meant to be something enjoyed between husband and wife!

2018-10-18 09:56:51 UTC  

People who take their faith seriously don't do it

2018-10-18 09:57:09 UTC  

but plenty of people are only Orthodox in name

2018-10-18 13:25:11 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/486385308951379968/502472213740650506/image0.jpg

2018-10-18 13:25:11 UTC  

Thoughts?

2018-10-18 13:26:23 UTC  

The article name for anyone wishing to read it is called *One Nation, Slightly Divisible (2001) by David Brooks*

2018-10-18 13:30:43 UTC  

Basically describes why there will always be race divided by culture and the best we can do is segregate in a very npc tone

2018-10-18 16:53:33 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/486385308951379968/502524651680038913/1539875873798.png

2018-10-18 16:53:38 UTC  

Tranny regrets sex change

2018-10-18 16:53:43 UTC  

/instant regret/

2018-10-18 19:28:39 UTC  

I have a better formatted version of this that I made

2018-10-18 21:28:55 UTC  

@NormieCamo oh thanks

2018-10-19 03:53:03 UTC  

why is that the life of a guy who works for the washington post (and it's arab) is sooooo important? how is that one news company has still so much power and can influence the foreign policy of an entire nation? <:HyperThinking:356316737588690944>

2018-10-19 03:53:40 UTC  

it's a mystery

2018-10-19 11:54:37 UTC  

honestly i don't know why anyone links vice articles because it's painfully obvious that they're 100% total clickbait of no real substance and often overt nonsense

2018-10-19 11:54:52 UTC  

giving them page views is just counterintuitive at this point

2018-10-19 13:14:21 UTC  

So we should just make archive.is copies and link them instead? Or just not bother with them?

2018-10-19 13:18:01 UTC  

when people link them it's usually to laugh at them so I guess use archive.is for that

2018-10-19 13:18:22 UTC  

but there's almost no reason to link a vice article in any semi-serious context

2018-10-20 00:32:15 UTC  

**Cole and Ohanian have included in their model one of the most flawed, least effective,
and weakly enforced pieces of New Deal legislation, NIRA. The discussion above points
out that the codes required by this law were not intended primarily to boost economic
growth. It seems fair to ask what would happen if Cole and Ohanian’s model were
modified to take into account all of the major New Deal laws, or at least those thought of
by liberal economists as pro-growth. It would be well-nigh impossible to build such a
model, but there are many reasons to think that it would show that the New Deal greatly
improved growth in the 1930s and even later. ** @agag

2018-10-20 00:32:22 UTC  

This sounds highly speculatory.

2018-10-20 00:34:09 UTC  

From what I'm reading, this is more of a explanitory reason as to why this person disagrees with while providing no other economic model including said portions of the ND, while making claims off of said hypothetical model.

2018-10-20 00:44:45 UTC  

but that's the main issue with what Cole and Ohanian are doing; they're taking one of the most flawed new deal policies, and one that only lasted for two years, and building a model off of it. The more important part is III C, which discusses the flaws with their cartelization hypothesis

2018-10-20 03:35:04 UTC  

@agag But your study, as far as I read, did not make an economic comparison for me to view or for greater knowledge to be grasped from.