Message from @PainSeeker5
Discord ID: 502472216487788555
Flammable Jewish Blood
Next level shit
<:FeelsLELMan:356316501105442817>
OH NOW THE HOLOBUNGA MAKE SENSE
If Jew blood flammable like oil, then Jew blood can be used as oil which the Germans needed, that's why they gassed them, because if they shot them they would bleed, then they burned their bodies and- wait they just lost all the fuel and used tons more to burn the bodies, nevermind.
@The_Don_73 I’m not aware of the “bear and hawk cage,” but lampshades, along with soap and shrunken heads, are addressed here http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/11/nazi-shrunken-heads-human-skin.html.
Not all witnesses are created equal. Testimony from people who were known to have worked as Sonderkommando, such as Shlomo Dragon, and testimony from officials, such as Höss, will obviously have greater weight than testimony from a nobody testifying 50 years later. In this case, Peer very clearly contradicts Höss's testimony that only one girl was ever found to have survived a gassing. It can be thrown out.
A trial from 1946 using the Soviet number does not mean that the Soviet number has been the long-standing consensus of western historians.
Other witnesses attest to crimes like those claimed in that newspaper article. Neither of the two highlighted there seem particularly unbelievable.
Ka-Tsetnik (aka Yehiel De-Nur) is a fiction author. No historian would consider his books to be legitimate testimony.
"Reported rumors."
Witnesses corroborate that Klaus Barbie's dog was trained to mount women. It's possible to train a dog to do this. Barbie wasn't called the Butcher of Lyon without reason. I see no particular reason to doubt this account, since it's corroborated and within the realm of possibility.
https://www.jta.org/1987/05/27/archive/six-witnesses-identify-barbie-who-was-ordered-back-to-court
https://web.archive.org/web/20141218013334/https://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/bchalmersv2vpaper.pdf
Olère made that claim in a private conversation to Pressac at an advanced age. It's possible that he had mentally deteriorated by that point, or that after several decades he had internalized a rumor as true. This certainly seems to be what Pressac is implying when he says that he "recounted anything that came into his head." This is the only source for that claim, so Olère does not seem to have been claiming this before his interaction with Pressac, or at least not publicly. One-off testimony decades after the war does not diminish the authenticity of paintings that he began making shortly before Auschwitz was closed up until 1962, 19 years before he made any claim of human sausages.
Blood is not flammable, this is true. But, gasoline is less dense than blood and would float on top of it. It's possible that he saw gasoline floating on top of blood burning. Even if this wasn't the case, one aspect of his testimony not holding up does not mean that the rest of it doesn't.
Do you find it impossible for prisoners to be killed by having a tree cut down from under them? Would such a method not work? This is simply a quote taken from a Nuremberg proceeding, it is not an argument on its own. Incredulity is not an argument, stranger things have happened.
Kurt Franz’s dog Barry being ordered to bite prisoner’s genitals is well-attested to. From *Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka: The Operation Reinhard Death Camps*
Rachel Auerbach’s *Oyf di Felder fun Treblinke*, the source of these claims, was published in 1947, very shortly after the war. It’s possible that the blood as a combustible material claim comes from the same story or a similar one to the one you posted earlier. It is true that women cremate more easily, or faster, than men, and that body fat was in fact used as fuel for ovens and burning pits. Tauber talks about this for incineration of bodies in ovens, saying that “During the incineration of such corpses, we used the coke only to light the fire of the furnace initially, for fatty corpses burned of their own accord thanks to the combustion of the body fat.” (https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/body-disposal/) So the rest of the claims here do make sense.
I won’t bother responding to your last meme. The people at Holocaust Controversies have already done a good job with debunking most of the retarded Holocaust memes. The only one I'll touch on is the masturbation machines one; this comes from *Stolen Soul*, which is a fraudulent book. Bernard Holstein's real name is Bernard Brougham, and he is a fraud.
you know
recently, i was wondering
Is it common for christians couples to have sex before marriage now?
we all know that it is for non christians
<:Thonk:362811285869559808>
Protestants Def yes catholic and orthodox depends on the region
@CaptainDynamite Orthodox Christian here- NO! I don't know if the youngins in my church do it behind closed doors but it's always said that Pre-marital sex is a sin as sex is meant to be something enjoyed between husband and wife!
People who take their faith seriously don't do it
but plenty of people are only Orthodox in name
The article name for anyone wishing to read it is called *One Nation, Slightly Divisible (2001) by David Brooks*
Basically describes why there will always be race divided by culture and the best we can do is segregate in a very npc tone
Tranny regrets sex change
/instant regret/
I have a better formatted version of this that I made
@NormieCamo oh thanks
why is that the life of a guy who works for the washington post (and it's arab) is sooooo important? how is that one news company has still so much power and can influence the foreign policy of an entire nation? <:HyperThinking:356316737588690944>
it's a mystery
honestly i don't know why anyone links vice articles because it's painfully obvious that they're 100% total clickbait of no real substance and often overt nonsense
giving them page views is just counterintuitive at this point
So we should just make archive.is copies and link them instead? Or just not bother with them?
when people link them it's usually to laugh at them so I guess use archive.is for that
but there's almost no reason to link a vice article in any semi-serious context
**Cole and Ohanian have included in their model one of the most flawed, least effective,
and weakly enforced pieces of New Deal legislation, NIRA. The discussion above points
out that the codes required by this law were not intended primarily to boost economic
growth. It seems fair to ask what would happen if Cole and Ohanian’s model were
modified to take into account all of the major New Deal laws, or at least those thought of
by liberal economists as pro-growth. It would be well-nigh impossible to build such a
model, but there are many reasons to think that it would show that the New Deal greatly
improved growth in the 1930s and even later. ** @agag
This sounds highly speculatory.
From what I'm reading, this is more of a explanitory reason as to why this person disagrees with while providing no other economic model including said portions of the ND, while making claims off of said hypothetical model.
but that's the main issue with what Cole and Ohanian are doing; they're taking one of the most flawed new deal policies, and one that only lasted for two years, and building a model off of it. The more important part is III C, which discusses the flaws with their cartelization hypothesis