ask me if i care about the BS equation taht has "g" in it <:lul:484994724118134784>

Well if you believ in bouyancy, you have to believe in its equation

thats the same BS as "r" (radius) stoopit shit ! <:lul:484994724118134784>

>believes in buoyancy
>nah i wont use the formula for buoyancy

Because for buoyant force to occur, there has to be a force applied to the masses of sepearate density

what do you think buoyancy is

lol

its stupid these flat earthers dont believe in maths

but believe in experiments

If there were no force applied to these masses, brownian motion would still mix them. Without this force(gravity) bouyancy doesnt work

oh wait, experiments leads to math

"Scientism" LOVES math!!..) ... <:lul:484994724118134784>
-- Mathematics²? yeah, all their numbers, equations, and formulas ..that (so-called) "prove things" and/or present sheer 'facts' ..have always kept changing throughout time. and still do.
-- scientists have substituted/substitute mathematics² (MYTHematics) for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.
-- mathematics .. is/are a mere product of the intellect without any physical reality, and as such could-not/CAN NOT provide physical causes in the investigation of nature.\

-- "Differential calculus".. They expand the deceit to "infinity", and put everything into circular argument.

We have the Panzer IV on our side now!

you can literally make an experiment for bouyancy, and the gradient of the graph will = 9.81

<:lul:484994724118134784> @✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧

because maths proves shit. Have you ever done algebra?

someone literally told me to stop using "force" while talking about archimedas principle @Send Pic of Main Hull

..uh..You do realize you can make a mathematical equation that says an elephant can balance on it's trunk, dont you? ..yeah.. "Equations" can be tweaked to fit whatever you want it to.

ok mike can you explain buoyancy

you just proved what flat earthers do @✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧

.... Ever heard of Louis Essen?... I highly doubt you have because he was conveniently silenced over 40+ years ago ! "The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis"? A member of the National Physical Laboratory of the UK from which he retired in 1972 after being quietly warned not to continue his contradiction of Einstein's theory of relativity. _"No one has attempted to refute my arguments, but I was warned that if I persisted I was likely to spoil my career prospects... the continued acceptance and teaching of relativity hinders the development of a rational extension of electromagnetic theory."_ - Louis Essen F.R.S. "Relativity and time signals", Wireless World, Oct78, p44
-- What about (freemason) "Sir" Isaac Newton→ (a 33rd Degree Mason), .. Isaac Newton, who's said to be the discoverer of gravity, knew there were problems with his theory. He claims to have invented the idea early in his life, but he knew that no mathematician of his day would approve of his theory, so he invented a whole new branch of mathematics, called fluxions, just to "prove" his theory. This became calculus, a deeply flawed branch having to do with so-called "infinitesimals" which have never been observed. Then when Einstein invented a new theory of gravity, he too, used an obscure bit of mathematics called tensors. It seems that every time there is a theory of gravity, it is mixed up with fringe" mathematics. Newton, by the way, was far from a secular scientist, and the bulk of his writings is actually on theology and Christianity.

>im depressed
>its depressing (at first), to realize you've been lied to your whole life ....

Newton was a 33rd degree MASON..
sir Isaac Newton was a member of lodge 859 in Cambridge.

Yeah, the elephant may balance on its trunk _IF_ the equation was followed to its exact variables

stop spamming, explain buoyancy

thats not spamming kiddo
.

well smart people back then were usually rich and powerful, as rich people could afford education

.........

u clearly dont know what spamming is then

smh

can you explain buoyancy or not

Panzer's right you know

ok forget about maths. Do an experiment. Ill show you how. Get different density liquids. and the same mass. with the mass calculate the time it takes to go down. Plot time against density of liquids on a graph. The gradient you work = 9.81

what a conincedence

oof

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e8/36/da/e836da002f4559ea94b6a875c759b8d2.jpg

<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

you cant

gotcha

dat "gotchya moment" <:lul:484994724118134784>

..when