Message from @Send Pic of Main Hull
Discord ID: 556805992885518336
stop spamming, explain buoyancy
thats not spamming kiddo
.
well smart people back then were usually rich and powerful, as rich people could afford education
.........
u clearly dont know what spamming is then
smh
can you explain buoyancy or not
Panzer's right you know
ok forget about maths. Do an experiment. Ill show you how. Get different density liquids. and the same mass. with the mass calculate the time it takes to go down. Plot time against density of liquids on a graph. The gradient you work = 9.81
what a conincedence
oof
<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>
you cant
gotcha
dat "gotchya moment" <:lul:484994724118134784>
..when
Good job, you figured out that objects with larger density are influenced by gravity greater then objects of lower density
<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>
when i asked you to explain something that you mentioned but instead doing that you decided to divert
ikr
so i conclude you have no idea what buoyancy is
i told yous what "Gravity" is
that picture prooves there is rgavity
earlier
i mean all your pics proove gravity
derp duhh derr 🤤
ah look, he insults you when he has nothing
ikr
scroll up
too ez win
thats basically fe
scroll up
these flat earther need more research
need repeating?
no, mike
*you* scroll up
and re-read how many questions we've asked you that you didnt answer
If buoyancy is a the only force, why no matter what density gradient there is, is it capped at 9.81m/s?
This entertaining to watch
ye
why 9.81