No he’s not saying that

Lel

He’s saying with a king those things wouldn’t be possible

I am saying you would need some entity applying significant force against the will of the people.

As that would undermine the state in the long term

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaAWC75cE-o

So the only way for this to work is for a king to already exist

because you cant install one currently

This monarch could be a king, a dictator, I do not care. But you do need some form of leader who is not reliant upon fulfilling campaign promises and pandering to niggers.

That is all.

We don’t leave in a vacuum

Things change

You fellas are pretty wild

I love America
I mostly love the Constitution
(I prefer the Articles of Confederation to a degree)

I just find that Democracy is ruining this nation as of now.

I don’t care much for the constitution but that’s another question

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Calcifer#6044 was banned***

People who have no concept of economics are becoming the leaders of the economy

Men with no concept of proper rationing of federal aid are being in charge of it.

That is insane. The fact that they're elected does not change the insanity, and the fact that they're elected is indicative of the ignorance of most.

You need, at some point, a central figure to dissolve the state as we know it.

What happened lol

Mods are tyrants

as usual

We ShOulD VoTe foR tHe mOdS

I like how you're comparing the Libertarian Confederalist to a die hard Monarchist. <:FeelsLELMan:356316501105442817>
It's pretty ironic tbh

How will you install this monarch?

@Punished Norm @Kierketard

No earthly idea. I would figure it would be similar to the US Revolution or any other massive change. I don't see how you could Democratically elect someone who is antithetical to half the nation.

and before Drumpf....

When the democratic state was imposed by force

Lmao

Drumpf is stil a Statist and is fucking mild by my measures.

I don't understand this
So you just want a monarch for the transitory period
but you are willing to fight a civil war and utterly destroy your opposition
why not go straight to a libertarian state?

Unless you are using the monarch to enforce it

Because it can’t survive in a democratic state

which means you get a libertarian state for as long as that particular monarch lives

What part of that are you not getting

Why not abolish the centralised government entirely?

The US was a libertarian state until maybe the 1850’s

Because that’s retarded