Message from @agag
Discord ID: 502241633513766912
that was my argument
edomites
can you back up that they were planning a coup against him and the state
@agag You're a pragmatist, why couldn't that be morally good?
K so that means you see nothing wrong with the CIA
Since it’s out of the same necessity
@Supreme Leader Kim 🧧 just because something is pragmatic doesn't mean it's necessarily morally good
the lesser of two evils is still an evil
Because you support the shootings of clerks working for the SA
And supporters of hitler
@agag not really because people can only speculate, but there was no other reason to do so
For reasons of national security
for power...
So clearly you shouldn’t have a problem with intelligence agencies
He was already chancellor at the time
And ?
they were loyal to him in theory if Rohm was
in a coalition government
^
a jew and a child torture fan
He murdered women and children
or got rid of some other way
bashing ns
clown world
i'm not working for the NSA, goy!
@agag It does. Whichever option is more pragmatic is morally 'good.' But w.e I don't think you're a utilitarian.
@Supreme Leader Kim 🧧 I'm not a strict utilitarian, there are times where utility is outweighed by other things
Yes they subvert countries. America is not the first country to be invaded.
the government shouldn't pursue utility when it violates natural rights
my argument was if it was done for the prevention of civil war then it was prudent
Bible > utility
if it was done for power then I agree it would be an evil act
and if it's done for the prevention of terrorism would it not also be prudent?
but I don't think he needed more power at that point, if Rohm was loyal that is
the sa loved him
you're not a Christian
you disgusting fucking hypocrite