Message from @Quasi
Discord ID: 502400217019056128
Where did God say that?
@Leiro レイロ what could be based on materialism? Genetic distance?
That makes no sense.
And Intelligence is biological, it's not influenced by civilization
Are....are you trolling
Where did God say that the right to free speech is *good?*
Free will is God's gift to man
He respects our free will, but that doesn't mean we **should** use it however we want
Duh
<@396901899724521482> who mixing with who
Whites cannot "mix" with whites, it's not mixing, that's normal reproduction
Not all speech is good but that doesn't mean it should be banned
So, why **should** we allow free speech as a right? Murder is also respected a part of free will, but that doesn't mean we allow it.
`Not all speech is good but that doesn't mean it should be banned`
Why not?
@Noxar look at it this way, centuries ago we had the silk road which prompted and prompted the exchange of goods, ideas and theories from one side of the world to another. That was how civilisation is built upon in that historical and material context. African tribes did not have access to such trade routes, and due to them being segregated from they have lower iq
OK ideas should be expressed instead of forced into back channels where they grow and rot
Why should *all* ideas by expressed?
Because then they can be contested
it's just a example, but most of the time, it's somwhat relevant to an extent @Noxar
So? Not all contestants are rational
@Leiro レイロ except you are incorrect
see: NPCs
IQ is biological, it's expressed in physical brain size @Leiro レイロ
Correct not all ideas are rational, that doesn't mean I should have a criminal record for voicing them
Principles* <@396901899724521482>
Quite the difference
lel
@Quasi what is with you and human rights, do you believe in slavery?
<@396901899724521482> np
@Noxar true, but this can be either aggravated or alieviated based upon material and historical contexts like how the example I gave
@Leiro レイロ no, it can't, this has already been tested in experiments
Why should free speech be a principle? Free speech is a relatively new concept and we had nations way before it.
`Correct not all ideas are rational, that doesn't mean I should have a criminal record for voicing them`
Why not if those ideas threaten the establishment (assuming our preferred establishment)
`what is with you and human rights, do you believe in slavery?`
I just believe in duty, not rights.
Oof
DO NOT TALK BACK TO A SENIOR MEMBER OF STAFF
<@!396901899724521482> Do you believe in God?
Alright I will delet
Would it then not be your duty to convince others of toxic ideologies instead of imprisoning them.
?
<@!396901899724521482> I am deleting you now, I am sorry. I will re-add you when you accept Jesus into your life.
Guys my new youth worker is based AF
<@!396901899724521482> I find it humorous that atheists think that religious people have only faith and no evidence yet usually have absolute faith in ''human rights''
@Leiro レイロ they've conducted experiments of for example taking black children and placing them in adoptive families, some went to White families, some into black families. They took IQ tests at certain points in their life - when adopted, growing up and adult.
The IQ of blacks growing up in white family was a point or 2 higher while young, but went down to the black average after they became adults.
The kids went to better schools, families had more money than the black families, etc. Yet their IQ didn't grow
IQ is absolutely biological
I was talking about an atheist I had in my contacts and Craig pointed it out, not you <@!396901899724521482>