Message from @Quasi
Discord ID: 502399553983610902
To remove free speech is directly creating thought crimes
@Leiro レイロ what?
That wasn't addressed to you
No, it's directly creating speech crimes
but I had to say it
you can think, but you can't express it
Again
Yes free speech is the god given right of free will
You actual NPC, can you justify free speech?
God given?
Where did God say that?
@Leiro レイロ what could be based on materialism? Genetic distance?
That makes no sense.
And Intelligence is biological, it's not influenced by civilization
Are....are you trolling
Where did God say that the right to free speech is *good?*
Free will is God's gift to man
He respects our free will, but that doesn't mean we **should** use it however we want
Duh
<@396901899724521482> who mixing with who
Whites cannot "mix" with whites, it's not mixing, that's normal reproduction
Not all speech is good but that doesn't mean it should be banned
So, why **should** we allow free speech as a right? Murder is also respected a part of free will, but that doesn't mean we allow it.
`Not all speech is good but that doesn't mean it should be banned`
Why not?
@Noxar look at it this way, centuries ago we had the silk road which prompted and prompted the exchange of goods, ideas and theories from one side of the world to another. That was how civilisation is built upon in that historical and material context. African tribes did not have access to such trade routes, and due to them being segregated from they have lower iq
OK ideas should be expressed instead of forced into back channels where they grow and rot
Why should *all* ideas by expressed?
Because then they can be contested
it's just a example, but most of the time, it's somwhat relevant to an extent @Noxar
So? Not all contestants are rational
@Leiro レイロ except you are incorrect
see: NPCs
IQ is biological, it's expressed in physical brain size @Leiro レイロ
<@!396901899724521482> can you justify that human right?
Correct not all ideas are rational, that doesn't mean I should have a criminal record for voicing them
Principles* <@396901899724521482>
Quite the difference
lel
@Quasi what is with you and human rights, do you believe in slavery?
<@396901899724521482> np
@Noxar true, but this can be either aggravated or alieviated based upon material and historical contexts like how the example I gave
@Leiro レイロ no, it can't, this has already been tested in experiments
Why should free speech be a principle? Free speech is a relatively new concept and we had nations way before it.
`Correct not all ideas are rational, that doesn't mean I should have a criminal record for voicing them`
Why not if those ideas threaten the establishment (assuming our preferred establishment)
`what is with you and human rights, do you believe in slavery?`
I just believe in duty, not rights.