Message from @Human Sheeple
Discord ID: 559391916001591296
I know that I sent a message similar to this but, it’s better being safe than sorry. (Since the announcements is closed for members, I’m only doing this once in the general chat.) I have an announcement to make. A server fell yesterday, called Enchanted Empire (it fell 3 times) and now it’s probably shut down for good. It was raided by the inside. Do NOT trust any of these people: 1. iSkeptical / 2. Avenixor / 3. Mercy/ZeroTwo (both are the same people) / 4. Dropoup King / 5. Child Services / 6. Dirty Dan / 7. Synth Tree / 8. TRILLION / 9. Carson / 10. Skelly gang / 11. ohuoukjlu / 12. DefenderBGT / And 13. Mad Sorcerer (Possibly one of the raiders)
🤔
I wonder how they predict selenelions
Saros Cycle
But how would the cycles predict selenelions?
@Technomatrix With a flat earth in ancient Babylon
Selenelions are supposed to be random I thought, because atmospheric refraction. Yet, they know ahead of time that it will occur off course
yeah right, light curves up
But how would they predict the refraction? There is very little info on it that I could find
I'm back
You can see a fully eclipsed moon and the sun ABOVE YOU in the sky at the same time
You CANNOT cast a custom shadow on the moon, you're on the Earth, if Earth's the cause of the moon's shadow, please go to wherever and whenever that point on the Earth causes the shadow and put up a big balloon
But they know that impossible feat will happen ahead of time, and I'm wondering how
Maybe the things in air curved the light
Idk tho
Just a thought
True, but the selenelion is a predictable phenomenon, despite it being impossible. Refraction doesn't just happen in predictable cycles, does it?
Actually, I think I might see why.
This is in locations where the sun rises, where the atmosphere is thickest
yes it does, fermat's principle
Meanwhile when we grill mick west about this he DELETES POSTS
When we dissect his code he admits he uses a "rule of thumb"
The NASA paper he cites claims infinite refraction
We have peer reviewed scientific evidence using lasers to clearly demonstrate light curves up away from the warm air towards the cooler air above
```"It is obvious that the effect of temperature variation is decisive over the
other atmospheric factors on refraction, to the following proportions: Tempera
ture to humidity to carbon dioxide content to air preEsure = 100 : 6 : 2 : 1 "
INVESTIGATION OF REFRACTION
IN THE LOW ATMOSPHERE
By
K. HORV_,.TH
Department of Survey. Technical university. Budapest
(Received Alay 29, 1969)
Presented by Ass. Prof. Dr. F. SAHKOZY```
Temperature is by far the most refractive cause
https://youtu.be/VPlCnbOhBRg
Very good video by Doctor John D a Geodeitic Surveyor
7/6R is just a way of approximating refractive circumstances at the horizon. Instead of modeling the light rays, you increase the radius for identical effects.
a 7/6R "rule of thumb" with zero experimental evidence does not prove a globe I am sorry
He's modelling light curve the WRONG WAY
light curves up and away from the surface Earth
It is based on the standard atmosphere linked on his calculator.
It also links the forum post explaining the 7/6R
Good afternoon