Message from @Citizen Z

Discord ID: 563416738134360112


2019-04-04 17:31:42 UTC  

A large enough sample of material, lol

2019-04-04 17:31:50 UTC  

Gtg battery low

2019-04-04 17:31:56 UTC  

ooh thats why its not possible

2019-04-04 17:32:01 UTC  

i was shocked for a sec

2019-04-04 17:32:13 UTC  

thought cern knew how to do that

2019-04-04 17:32:17 UTC  

huh

2019-04-04 17:32:56 UTC  

click the link for info of this theory its interesting

2019-04-04 17:33:14 UTC  

Actually JINR in Russia is responsible for discovering most new elements through that process.

2019-04-04 17:33:22 UTC  

but adding alien tech isnt really an arguement

2019-04-04 17:33:56 UTC  

well russians did the first launch

2019-04-04 17:34:08 UTC  

you cant ingore their intelligence

2019-04-04 17:34:23 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/563416088990318684/FB_IMG_1526483680156.jpg

2019-04-04 17:35:35 UTC  

Yes, that is correct

2019-04-04 17:35:40 UTC  

you guys forget the fact that gravity could work on a flat surfece

2019-04-04 17:35:55 UTC  

what force is pulling us then?

2019-04-04 17:36:05 UTC  

Gravity has no explanation in standard quantum physics

2019-04-04 17:36:06 UTC  

or masses in general

2019-04-04 17:36:34 UTC  

quantum physics isnt the easiest subject to explain

2019-04-04 17:36:44 UTC  

No, it’s not

2019-04-04 17:36:56 UTC  

That doesn’t mean it’s wrong either

2019-04-04 17:36:58 UTC  

Because its mostly thoughts

2019-04-04 17:37:11 UTC  

just cause you dont understand it doesnt mean everything around it is faulse

2019-04-04 17:37:21 UTC  

so atooms arent real?

2019-04-04 17:37:26 UTC  

just thoughts

2019-04-04 17:37:35 UTC  

Experimental physics is distinct from theoretical physics.

2019-04-04 17:38:14 UTC  

yeah i know

2019-04-04 17:38:24 UTC  

Theoretical physics is usually celestial objects or “theories-of-everything”.

2019-04-04 17:39:11 UTC  

its about how they work using our accuared knoweldge with our own planet

2019-04-04 17:39:17 UTC  

and other subjects

2019-04-04 17:39:29 UTC  

its not 100% accurate but mostly is

2019-04-04 17:43:36 UTC  

Yeah the 115 to 116 thing is alien tech. 116 decays way too quickly and its out of our reach currently. We don't know how to store it and creating a small particle accelerator is too hard

2019-04-04 17:44:24 UTC  

Well, depends on your definition, Le Boy

2019-04-04 17:44:34 UTC  

String theory is 100% accurate

2019-04-04 17:45:04 UTC  

@Ætos well no its still a theory

2019-04-04 17:45:05 UTC  

But also almost entirely *unprovable* simply because we can not detect 1 dimensional objects.

2019-04-04 17:45:20 UTC  

It is accurate. It has no mathematical flaws.

2019-04-04 17:45:44 UTC  

Still a theory though

2019-04-04 17:45:45 UTC  

It doesn’t violate any part of reality either.

2019-04-04 17:46:04 UTC  

But like I said, entirely unprovable on a very fundamental basis.

2019-04-04 17:47:52 UTC  

if you are blind foulded and sitting on a chair and can theoritically prove you are sitting on onebut havent visualy saw it

2019-04-04 17:47:58 UTC  

is it still a theory