Scientists do lie and decieve on many topics. Evolutions existence is not one of them

In fact, they are lying and manipulating the facts to make it look like divergent evolution did not occur in humans.

When you push people that do not believe in evolution, they usally try to make a distinction between macro and micro.

Thats because they know they can not win in saying micro does not exist so they make up a difference between it happening a little and a lot

Like saying even though I can walk to the shop, you never saw me walk up Everest and therefore it cant happen.

Or you never 'observed' the murder take place

so we can not convict anyone.

Honestly, I don’t subscribe to a notion there’s micro evolution either. https://youtu.be/NGtNsYHC8xc

Why

Is the earth flat

I dont think it is

Cause i think it is

I am a animal breeder who works with genetic and that is basically micro evolution
Have also worked with animals who have become an entirely new species and that is macro evolution
There is even documented cases of animals becoming entirely new species

Well it would be a conversation for another day

Jk

If u do believe it yall fuckers are idiots

You mean dogs can breed with cats? No..

Except you can see where the light is touching everywhere in the room.

@Seeker of Truth it shouldn't have an instant cutoff

you see how it gets dimmer

No where on earth did you get that from?

Animals become entirely new species when their genetics have differed enough for them to be unable to breed

I work mainly on snake genetics with ball pythons it is actually pretty cool to see how one or few genes change a animal looks entirely

The idea that speciation is the inability to breed does not apply to most species

Many species are asexual

How do we classify them?

You can even breed snakes without scales

Selective breeding isnt evolution, because you guiding the process

But it is interesting

Actually the Scaleless gene was found in the wild

It probably was

It was