Message from @Human Sheeple
Discord ID: 569329135642738728
how are none of the other buildings in that picture he sent not exposed to extreme heat lol
@The Gwench You wait until you look into building 6 😂
hey guys
@TheObliterator that video is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen. What strength of steel was used in that experiment. Who listens to a bohunk like that?
Lol
Mick West won't even touch that with a very long disinfected pole
Yeah buildings internal structure just naturally collapses leaving the outside intact. SLOPPY JOB MOSSAD
NIST didn't even touch WTC6
WTC7 they fucked up, but they managed to bring down the building, they fucked up BIG TIME on WTC6
Look into Kurt Sonnenfeld
He was a FEMA photographer, he leaked his tapes online, then they killed his wife in a botched hit, they pinned him for murdering his wife, he fled to Argentina and demanded extradition.
Dang. That sounds interesting.
WTC7 falls apart with NO LATERAL BUCKLING
WTC6 they don't even have a story for
memory hole is their only defense
What happened to WTC6
Wtf
i.e. absolute proof of inside job
Where was WTC6
Wtc 7 was built with some of strongest steel beams ever
Should never of been a total collapse at freefall speed
Even with office fires
In controlled demolitions, explosions are seen throughout the building
in that video, none are seen
What most don't know is that WTC 7 had 2 of the largest steel beams ever fabricated installed over the Con Edison Substation that was in the building. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/19/realestate/commercial-property-salomon-solution-building-within-building-cost-200-million.html
It wasnt explosions used
Thermite
''We built in enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building's structural integrity, on the assumption that someone might need double-height floors,'' said Larry Silverstein, president of the company. ''Sure enough, Salomon had that need.
Now you just in denial. Did you even watch what NIST says? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I Do you have an argument or just proof by assertion? @TheObliterator
We don't have the physical evidence from WTC 7. Only a single sample of WTC 7 was ever collected. This is actually the only sample with a known chain of custody. FEMA's metallurgical analysis concluded "Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on
the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent
intergranular melting, was
readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic
mixture containing primarily
iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed
during this hot corrosion attack
on the steel. This sulfur-rich
liquid penetrated preferentially
down grain boundaries of the
steel, severely weakening the beam and making it susceptible to erosion.
The eutectic temperature for this mixture strongly suggests that
the temperatures in this region of the steel beam approached 1,000 °C (1,800 °F), which is substantially
lower than would be expected for melting this steel. "
Definitely some anomalies with this 9/11 event