In controlled demolitions, explosions are seen throughout the building

in that video, none are seen

What most don't know is that WTC 7 had 2 of the largest steel beams ever fabricated installed over the Con Edison Substation that was in the building. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/19/realestate/commercial-property-salomon-solution-building-within-building-cost-200-million.html

It wasnt explosions used

Thermite

''We built in enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building's structural integrity, on the assumption that someone might need double-height floors,'' said Larry Silverstein, president of the company. ''Sure enough, Salomon had that need.

Now you just in denial. Did you even watch what NIST says? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I Do you have an argument or just proof by assertion? @TheObliterator

We don't have the physical evidence from WTC 7. Only a single sample of WTC 7 was ever collected. This is actually the only sample with a known chain of custody. FEMA's metallurgical analysis concluded "Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on
the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent
intergranular melting, was
readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic
mixture containing primarily
iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed
during this hot corrosion attack
on the steel. This sulfur-rich
liquid penetrated preferentially
down grain boundaries of the
steel, severely weakening the beam and making it susceptible to erosion.
The eutectic temperature for this mixture strongly suggests that
the temperatures in this region of the steel beam approached 1,000 °C (1,800 °F), which is substantially
lower than would be expected for melting this steel. "

Definitely some anomalies with this 9/11 event

I wonder why he disabled comments on the video.... HMMM

@TheObliterator ffs are you another sheep?

I just got my new chrome desktop

@Mr.science What is it exactly?

You guys want to see

Sheep NEVER look at shit

REFRACTIVE WAVE OVER THE MOON: https://imgur.com/a/Np1aGgw

wait chrome makes desktops? i thought they only made laptops

nice mouse

Thanks I like Razer products

Sick

i got a corsair mouse

@eletrick33 those are nice too

APOLLO FLAG WAVING: https://imgur.com/a/X5tpR1K
APOLLO FAKING THE GLOBE DIM LIGHTS CABIN WINDOW: https://imgur.com/a/q1xOIex
STRINGS SEEN DURING APOLLO DOCKING: https://imgur.com/a/107rvIj

it was on sale for 40$ while it usually goes for 60

We didn’t land in the moon it was a race to land first

This chrome desktop was about 400$

and how do you know those pictures are real? @Human Sheeple

@Mr.science thats a nice google setup you got there, also respect for mixing the razer and corsair haha

@sunshower thanks I always loved chrome desktops chrome os is better than the MacBooks

I like macOS and ChromeOS but ChromeOS is so much more nice looking and performance wise is amazing

macbooks are the big succ and not the good kind of succ

macOS on a normal desktop is great (i.e. hackintosh)

macbooks though are

If you guys need me I'll be in another vc chat

🤢

they dont even support like 2% of steam games

186000 miles

true

i like macOS, though.

not the more recent ones though